Skip to main content
. 2007 Jun 6;27(23):6313–6319. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5369-06.2007

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Example of CBF image acquisition trial. Each trial followed an instructed threat procedure in which one of three conditions (N, P, or U) was presented for ∼1.5 min. Each condition was preceded and followed by 30 s of filler that was not included in analyses. In the N condition, no unpleasant events (shocks) were delivered. In the P condition (shown), unpleasant events were administered only in the presence of a threat cue. In the U condition, unpleasant events were delivered at any time. During each trial, two 10-s-duration cues were presented. Cues consisted of different colored shapes (color omitted here). The cues signaled the possibility of receiving an aversive stimulus in the P condition but had no signal value in the other conditions. Throughout each trial, a computer monitor apprised participants of the current condition by displaying one of the following messages: “No Unpleasant Event” (neutral), “Unpleasant Event Only During Red Square” (predictable), or “Unpleasant Event at Any Time” (unpredictable). This information, in the absence of a cue, constituted the context for each condition. One shock was administered during each trial involving a P or U condition. The shocks were delivered simultaneously with the offset of a cue in the P condition and in the absence of the cue in the U condition. Two CBF images were acquired in each condition: one when the cue was displayed along with the instructions and another when the cue was absent (i.e., during the context only). Thus, one CBF scan was acquired per trial.