Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan 18;147(4):717–724.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.10.007

Table 4.

Association of disc change classification status and putative risk factors in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS) five-year optic disc study

Putative Risk Factors Disc Change Classification P-value Total
Reversal of Cupping N=23 No Change N=303 Glaucomatous Progression N=22
Mean (SD) Sphere (diopters) −1.9 (2.7) −1.2 (2.7) −1.7 (2.5) 0.32a −1.3 (2.7)
N (%)Sphere ≤ −6 1 (4%) 27 (9%) 3 (14%) 0.58c 31 (9%)
Mean (SD) Follow-up IOP 10.2 (3.8) 16.7 (4.5) 17.4 (3.1) <0.001a 16.4 (4.7)
N (%) Follow-up IOP ≤5 mmHg 1 (5%) 2 (1%) 0 0.34c 3 (1%)
Mean (SD) Baseline minus Follow-up IOP 17.5 (5.5) 10.8 (6.2) 11.5 (6.7) <0.001a 11.3 (6.3)
Mean (SD) Baseline Acuity (ETDRS letters) 85.4 (4.8) 86.2 (5.6) 86.7 (5.6) 0.72a 86.2 (5.5)
Mean (SD) Follow-up Acuity (ETDRS letters) 78.9 (15.1) 84.1 (9.2) 83.9 (11.0) 0.054a 83.8 (9.8)
Mean (SD) Baseline minus Follow-up Acuity (ETDRS letters) −6.5 (15.0) −2.1 (8.8) −2.8 (10.3) 0.098a −2.4 (9.5)
Mean (SD) Horizontal Cup/Disc Ratio 0.63 (0.18) 0.61 (0.22) 0.60 (0.19) 0.86a 0.61 (0.22)
Mean (SD) Vertical Cup/Disc Ratio 0.68 (0.15) 0.64 (0.22) 0.66 (0.18) 0.66a 0.64 (0.21)
Mean (SD) Age at Randomization 55.6 (11.8) 57.6 (10.6) 57.0 (11.1) 0.66a 57.4 (10.7)
N (%) African American Ancestry 5 (22%) 118 (39%) 9 (41%) 0.25b 132 (38%)
a

One-way analysis of variance

b

Chi-square test

c

Exact permutation chi-square test