Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 30;338:b2376. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2376

Table 2.

 Treatment effects of statin therapy. Values are odds ratios (95% confidence intervals)

Source All cause mortality Major coronary events Major cerebrovascular events Coronary heart disease mortality Non-fatal myocardial infarction Revascularisations Fatal or non-fatal cancer
WOSCOPSw9 0.78 (0.60 to 1.01) 0.68 (0.56 to 0.83) 0.90 (0.60 to 1.34) 0.73 (0.48 to1.11) 0.69 (0.55 to 0.85) 0.63 (0.44 to 0.90) 1.09 (0.84 to 1.43)
AFCAPS/TexCAPSw8 1.04 (0.76 to 1.43) 0.61 (0.45 to 0.83) 0.82 (0.40 to 1.67)* 0.73 (0.34 to 1.60) NR 0.69 (0.55 to 0.86) 0.97 (0.81 to 1.16)
PROSPERw6 0.98 (0.79 to 1.21)* 0.90 (0.70 to 1.15) 1.03 (0.72 to 1.47) NR NR 0.82 (0.54 to 1.25)* NR†
ALLHAT-LLTw7 0.99 (0.88 to 1.11) 0.90 (0.78 to 1.04) 0.90 (0.75 to 1.09) 0.99 (0.79 to 1.24) NR NR 1.03 (0.89 to 1.19)
ASCOT-LLAw10 0.85 (0.73 to 0.97) 0.64 (0.52 to 0.78) 0.77 (0.63 to 0.95) NR NR NR NR
HPSw5 NR 0.57 (0.41 to 0.79)* NR NR NR NR NR
CARDSw4 0.72 (0.51 to 1.02) 0.65 (0.44 to 0.97) 0.52 (0.31 to 0.90) 0.74 (0.40 to 1.36) 0.59 (0.36 to 0.98) 0.69 (0.41 to 1.17) 0.65 (0.37 to 1.16)
ASPENw3 1.06 (0.69 to 1.64) NR 0.92 (0.54 to 1.56) NR NR 0.92 (0.60 to 1.40) NR
MEGAw2 0.71 (0.50 to 1.00) 0.55 (0.33 to 0.91) 0.83 (0.57 to 1.20) 0.55 (0.22 to 1.38) 0.55 (0.30 to 1.00) 0.60 (0.40 to 0.90) 0.97 (0.75 to 1.25)
JUPITERw1 0.80 (0.66 to 0.96) NR 0.51 (0.34 to 0.78) NR 0.35 (0.22 to 0.58) 0.54 (0.40 to 0.72) 0.89 (0.77 to 1.04)
All trials fixed effects model 0.90 (0.84 to 0.96) 0.74 (0.68 to 0.81) 0.82 (0.74 to 0.91) 0.88 (0.73 to 1.05) 0.61 (0.52 to 0.73) 0.67 (0.59 to 0.76) 0.97 (0.89 to 1.05)
All trials random effects model 0.88 (0.81 to 0.96) 0.70 (0.61 to 0.81) 0.81 (0.71 to 0.93) 0.88 (0.73 to 1.05) 0.56 (0.41 to 0.76) 0.67 (0.59 to 0.76) 0.97 (0.89 to 1.05)
Heterogeneity:
 Q statistic 0.20 0.02‡ 0.23 0.49 0.11 0.48 0.61
 I2 index Low (27%) Moderate (60%) Low (24%) Low (0%) Moderate (50%) Low (0%) Low (0%)

NR=not reported. See footnote to table 1 for full titles of studies.

*Data from Thavendiranathan et al.14 Fixed effect and random effect models in meta-analysis gave almost identical results, making important statistical heterogeneity unlikely.

†No data in primary prevention group (n=3239).w6

‡Significant heterogeneity; however, a positive trend of statin therapy is observed in all trials, only of different magnitude (no neutral or negative trials).