Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug;44(4):1326–1344. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00965.x

Table 4.

Association of Interpersonal Processes-of-Care Short-Form Measures with Patient Satisfaction with Care

Global Satisfaction with Physicians
Global Satisfaction with Health Care
Recommend Physicians to Close Friend or Family Member
Variable B p-value B p-value OR (95% CI)
Covariates
Age (in 10 year increments) 0.003 .021 0.007 <.0001 1.22 (1.09, 1.36)
Female 0.165 <.001 0.153 .002
Education*
Household income**
Health insurance .133 .010 .089
None 0.109 .356 −0.124 .325 0.96 (0.40, 2.33)
Public only 0.102 .059 0.157 .006 1.68 (1.05, 2.68)
Any private Reference Reference Reference
Self-rated health 0.100 <.0001 0.133 <.0001
Race/ethnicity/language group .059 .230
African Americans 0.110 .140 0.131 .087
English-speaking Latinos 0.032 .691 0.081 .320
Spanish-speaking Latinos Reference Reference
Whites 0.165 .028 0.144 .061
IPC measures
Lack of clarity (−) § § § §
Interaction with race/ethnicity .017 .007
African Americans 0.035S .437 0.048S .322
English-speaking Latinos 0.087S .103 0.088S .118
Spanish-speaking Latinos −0.136A,E .013 −0.159A,E .006
Whites −0.042 .395 −0.050 .339
Elicited concerns/responded (+) 0.467 <.0001 0.470 <.0001 2.23 (1.74, 2.85)
Explained results (+) § § 0.055 .038 1.28 (1.08, 1.51)
Interaction with race/ethnicity .003
African Americans 0.096S .021
English-speaking Latinos 0.134S .002
Spanish-speaking Latinos −0.075A,E,W .111
Whites 0.107S .013
Decided together (+) 0.095 <.0001 0.065 <.001 1.23 (1.06, 1.43)
Compassionate/respectful (+) 0.184 <.0001 § § 2.08 (1.66, 2.61)
Interaction with race/ethnicity .001
African Americans 0.086W .145
English-speaking Latinos 0.180S <.001
Spanish-speaking Latinos −0.054E,W .395
Whites 0.239A,S <.0001
Discriminated due to race/ethnicity (−) −0.092 .028 −0.174 <.001 0.82 (0.63, 1.05)
Disrespectful office staff (−) § § −0.081 .005 0.84 (0.69, 1.02)
Interaction with race/ethnicity .005
African Americans 0.102E,S,W .041
English-speaking Latinos −0.096A .040
Spanish-speaking Latinos −0.092A .236
Whites −0.116A .016
R2 0.47 .43 0.49

(−) Indicates that a higher score=worse IPC; (+) indicates that a higher score=better IPC; higher satisfaction scores=greater satisfaction; that is, a higher score indicates more of the construct on a 1–5 scale.

*

1=less than high school, 2=high school, 3=some college, 4=college degree, 5=graduate degree.

**

1=≤$25,000, 2=$25,001–$40,000, 3=$40,001–$75,000, 4=$75,000 or more.

Variable dropped through backward elimination (p-value>.20 for main effects and p-value>.05 for interaction effects).

1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good, 5=excellent.

§

Main effect not reported due to significant interaction of IPC and race/ethnicity/language; results from stratified analyses are presented instead.

Parameter estimates within each group are from separate slopes model; in each model, superscripts indicate that the indexed parameter significantly differed (p<.05) from the corresponding parameter in one or more racial/ethnic groups designated as A, African American; E, English-speaking Latino; S, Spanish-speaking Latino; W, White.

IPC, interpersonal processes of care.