Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jul 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Oct;89(4):1469–1476. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.89.4.1469

Table 2.

Metabolic characteristics of nerve-repair grafted and control medial gastrocnemius muscle with or without synergistic muscles intact in 6-mo-old male Fischer 344 rats

Experimental Group P Value


Sham
control
Nerve-repair
grafted
Synergist-ablated
control
Synergist-ablated
nerve-repair grafted
Effect of
grafting
Effect of
ablation
Effect of
grafting × ablation
Body weight, g 371 ± 9
(10)
380 ± 5
(10)
346 ± 5c
(10)
356 ± 5d
(10)
NS 0.003 NS
Muscle protein content,
  mg protein/g tissue
232 ± 12
(8)
205 ± 11
(7)
153 ± 10c
(9)
173 ± 7d,e
(10)
NS < 0.001 0.024
Glycogen content,
  µmol/g muscle
36 ± 2
(9)
30 ± 1a
(7)
12 ± 1c
(10)
14 ± 1b,d,e
(10)
NS < 0.0001 0.0002
Citrate synthase,
  µmol · µg−1 · min−1
176 ± 18
(6)
139 ± 3a
(5)
175 ± 4
(9)
149 ± 8b,e
(10)
0.002 NS NS
Hexokinase, U/mg protein 25 ± 6
(8)
58 ± 5a
(7)
47 ± 2c
(10)
48 ± 1d,e
(10)
< 0.0001 NS < 0.0001
GLUT-4 protein,
  %sham control
100 ± 4
(10)
101 ± 5
(10)
170 ± 15c
(8)
175 ± 12d,e
(8)
NS < 0.0001 NS
GLUT-1 protein,
  %sham control
100 ± 9
(8)
143 ± 19
(9)
85 ± 11
(5)
137 ± 24
(5)
0.012 NS NS

Values are means ± SE; nos. in parentheses is no. of rats for each group.

a

Nerve-repair grafted is significantly different from sham control group, P ≤ 0.05.

b

Synergist-ablated nerve-repair grafted is significantly different from synergist-ablated control group, P ≤ 0.05.

c

Synergist-ablated control is significantly different from sham control group, P < 0.05.

d

Synergist-ablated nerve-repair grafted is significantly different from nerve-repair grafted group, P ≤ 0.05.

e

Synergist-ablated nerve-repair grafted is significantly different from sham control group, P ≤ 0.05.