Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 3;89(1):19–26. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26147

TABLE 2.

Walking scores, walking score changes, BMI, weight, and weight change by sex from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study (n = 23,633 observations across 4995 individuals; 1985–1986 to 2000–2001)1

Year 0: 1985–1986 (n = 4949) Year 2: 1987–1988 (n = 4351) Year 5: 1990–1991 (n = 3934) Year 7: 1992–1993 (n = 3605) Year 10: 1995–1996 (n = 3443) Year 15: 2000–2001 (n = 3265)
Walking score (EU)2
 Women3 57.3 ± 1.04 51.7 ± 1.14 51.2 ± 1.14 49.8 ± 1.14 50.0 ± 1.24 50.5 ± 1.24
 Men3 53.4 ± 1.2 46.9 ± 1.2 43.5 ± 1.2 44.2 ± 1.2 43.2 ± 1.3 47.5 ± 1.4
Walking score change (EU)
 Women −6.8 ± 1.3 −1.5 ± 1.3 −1.1 ± 1.3 0.3 ± 1.3 1.2 ± 1.4
 Men −7.7 ± 1.4 −4.5 ± 1.4 0.25 ± 1.4 −0.6 ± 1.4 4.4 ± 1.5
BMI (kg/m2)
 Women5 24.6 ± 0.1 25.2 ± 0.1 26.3 ± 0.1 27.0 ± 0.24 27.9 ± 0.24 29.1 ± 0.24
 Men5 24.4 ± 0.1 25.1 ± 0.1 25.9 ± 0.1 26.5 ± 0.1 27.2 ± 0.1 28.3 ± 0.1
Weight (kg)
 Women5 66.2 ± 0.34 67.8 ± 0.44 70.9 ± 0.44 73.4 ± 0.44 75.7 ± 0.54 79.1 ± 0.54
 Men5 77.0 ± 0.3 78.9 ± 0.3 82.0 ± 0.4 84.0 ± 0.4 86.0 ± 0.4 89.8 ± 0.5
Annualized weight change (kg/y)
 Women 0.9 ± 0.05 0.9 ± 0.05 1.1 ± 0.06 0.8 ± 0.054 0.7 ± 0.04
 Men 1.0 ± 0.05 1.0 ± 0.04 0.9 ± 0.06 0.7 ± 0.05 0.7 ± 0.04
1

All values are mean ± SE. EU, exercise units calculated on the basis of frequency and intensity of activity.

2

Sex-by-time interaction for walking score, P = 0.02 (likelihood ratio test).

3

Within sex, P for trend < 0.05.

4

Significantly different from men, P < 0.05 (t test).

5

Main effect of time within sex, P < 0.00001 (one-factor ANOVA).