Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 24;106(31):12573–12579. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906545106

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Characterization of the contractile properties and the DGC structure in the Largemyd muscle. (A–C) EDL muscle mass (A), maximum force (B), and specific force (C) before subjection to the lengthening-contraction protocol. (D) Force deficits following the lengthening-contraction protocol, as measured for EDL muscles in vitro from C57BL/6 (n = 6) and Largemyd (n = 6) mice. (*, P < 0.05.) All data are presented as the mean ± SEM. (E) Solubilized C57BL/6 and Largemyd skeletal muscle were enriched for DGC by wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) affinity chromatography and separated on 10–30% sucrose gradients. Gradient fractions (1, top; 13, bottom) were blotted with antibodies against core α-DG, dystrophin (Dys), α-sarcoglycan (SG), γ-SG, and β-DG. (F and G) Ultrastructural analysis of quadriceps muscles from Largemyd mice were observed under electron microscopy. Black arrowhead, basal lamina; white arrowhead, sarcolemma; asterisk, dissociation of basal lamina and sarcolemma.