Skip to main content
. 2009 May 13;119(3):397–416. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1047-9

Table 5.

Comparison of bootstrap confidence intervals for pgs from a simulation study on Inline graphic for a range of values of genetic similarity pgs and expected numbers of fragments m1 and m2, 10,000 replicated pairs of AFLP profiles, 1,000 bootstrap resamples, fldFS from A. thaliana with N = 450

Parameter settings Results for Inline graphic: 95% bootstrap confidence intervals for pgs
Percentile bootstrap c.i. Bias corrected bootstrap c.i. BCa c.i.
pgs m1, m2 Non-coverage% (too low, too high) Length (trunc) Non-coverage% (too low, too high) Length (trunc) Non-coverage% (too low, too high) Length (trunc)
0.0 40 40 6.98 (5.57, 1.41) 0.2495 (0.1324) 6.50 (4.73, 1.77) 0.2517 (0.1386) 5.34 (3.04, 2.30) 0.2584 (0.1522)
70 70 5.68 (3.63, 2.05) 0.2670 (0.1332) 5.60 (3.40, 2.20) 0.2672 (0.1354) 5.45 (2.88, 2.57) 0.2680 (0.1396)
120 120 5.40 (3.08, 2.32) 0.2862 (0.1382) 5.48 (3.23, 2.25) 0.2862 (0.1381) 5.38 (3.11, 2.27) 0.2862 (0.1387)
0.1 40 40 5.70 (4.16, 1.54) 0.2893 (0.2369) 5.21 (3.47, 1.74) 0.2904 (0.2416) 4.53 (2.28, 2.25) 0.2942 (0.2511)
70 70 5.25 (3.18, 2.07) 0.2777 (0.2255) 5.28 (3.01, 2.27) 0.2778 (0.2778) 4.93 (2.53, 2.40) 0.2781 (0.2297)
120 120 5.05 (2.95, 2.10) 0.2796 (0.2220) 4.98 (2.86, 2.12) 0.2797 (0.2220) 4.92 (2.80, 2.12) 0.2797 (0.2223)
0.3 40 40 5.49 (3.30, 2.19) 0.3201 (0.3187) 5.34 (2.90, 2.44) 0.3200 (0.3189) 4.73 (2.16, 2.57) 0.3205 (0.3197)
70 70 5.54 (2.89, 2.65) 0.2781 (0.2776) 5.51 (2.80, 2.71) 0.2780 (0.2776) 5.29 (2.55, 2.74) 0.2780 (0.2776)
120 120 5.19 (2.57, 2.62) 0.2580 (0.2578) 5.25 (2.60, 2.65) 0.2581 (0.2579) 5.08 (2.58, 2.50) 0.2582 (0.2579)
0.5 40 40 4.97 (2.66, 2.31) 0.3074 4.75 (2.44, 2.31) 0.3072 4.30 (2.17, 2.13) 0.3070
70 70 5.09 (2.42, 2.67) 0.2548 5.04 (2.41, 2.63) 0.2547 4.72 (2.30, 2.42) 0.2548
120 120 5.23 (2.66, 2.57) 0.2246 5.24 (2.62, 2.62) 0.2246 4.99 (2.68, 2.31) 0.2250
0.7 40 40 5.73 (2.41, 3.32) 0.2568 5.48 (2.49, 2.99) 0.2573 4.76 (2.47, 2.29) 0.2586
70 70 5.22 (2.28, 2.94) 0.2065 5.14 (2.32, 2.82) 0.2068 4.76 (2.41, 2.35) 0.2078
120 120 5.63 (2.32, 3.31) 0.1760 5.53 (2.41, 3.12) 0.1762 5.38 (2.73, 2.65) 0.1770
0.9 40 40 6.30 (1.62, 4.68) 0.1517 5.53 (1.76, 3.77) 0.1542 3.83 (2.18, 1.65) 0.1613
70 70 5.89 (1.58, 4.31) 0.1202 5.33 (1.83, 3.50) 0.1213 4.29 (2.36, 1.93) 0.1250
120 120 5.64 (1.63, 4.01) 0.1004 5.49 (1.91, 3.58) 0.1011 4.65 (2.36, 2.29) 0.1032
0.95 40 40 9.15 (0.85, 8.30) 0.1020 7.07 (1.04, 6.03) 0.1060 5.16 (1.59, 3.57) 0.1173
70 70 7.63 (1.18, 6.45) 0.0829 6.48 (1.49, 4.99) 0.0850 4.63 (2.22, 2.41) 0.0907
120 120 6.82 (1.31, 5.51) 0.0682 5.99 (1.48, 4.51) 0.0708 4.37 (2.30, 2.07) 0.0742
0.5 100 50 5.30 (2.79, 2.51) 0.2337 5.37 (2.72, 2.65) 0.2336 5.03 (2.56, 2.47) 0.2336
0.5 100 80 5.23 (2.68, 2.55) 0.2364 5.17 (2.65, 2.52) 0.2365 5.03 (2.65, 2.38) 0.2367
0.7 70 40 5.62 (2.33, 3.29) 0.2150 5.35 (2.20, 3.15) 0.2149 4.81 (2.17, 2.64) 0.2157
0.7 80 70 5.48 (2.54, 2.94) 0.2009 5.51 (2.63, 2.88) 0.2012 5.21 (2.83, 2.38) 0.2021

Shown are non-coverage percentages (with left and right non-coverage percentages) and mean length of (1) 95% percentile bootstrap c.i., (2) 95% bias-corrected bootstrap c.i., and (3) 95% accelerated bias-corrected (BCa) bootstrap c.i