Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 11.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2008 Sep 9;157(1):95–104. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.08.060

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Correspondence between auditory evoked potentials recorded from humans in the Cz configuration (panel A) and mice (panel B). Morphology of the waveforms is largely homologous between species with the main peaks labeled P1, N1, and P2. The latencies of ERP peaks from mice are approximately 40% of those recorded from humans. The amplitudes are smaller in humans reflecting the use of scalp EEG rather than depth electrodes in mice.