Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 28;15(28):3542–3549. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3542

Table 3.

Comparison of nutritional parameters in different SGA grades

Nutritional parameters The grade of SGA
F P Correlation coeffient (r) P
SGA-A SGA-B SGA-C
Weight loss (%) 2.2 ± 2.9 9.7 ± 7.0 23.2 ± 12.6 296.0 0.000 0.65 0.00
BMI 23.4 ± 3.0 21.2 ± 2.8 19.0 ± 3.3 70.8 0.000 0.40 0.00
TSF (mm)
Male 16.0 ± 8.5 10.5 ± 6.2 9.2 ± 6.5 31.9 0.000 0.34 0.00
Female 25.0 ± 10.2 17.4 ± 8.3 14.4 ± 10.0 26.6 0.000 0.38 0.00
MAMC (cm)
Male 21.8 ± 2.3 21.9 ± 2.1 20.6 ± 2.5 2.4 0.095 0.03 0.50
Female 18.2 ± 2.5 18.6 ± 2.4 16.8 ± 2.5 4.1 0.018 0.02 0.71
ALB (g/L) 37.7 ± 4.2 35.7 ± 5.7 30.5 ± 6.6 36.9 0.000 0.29 0.00
PA (mg/L) 246.7 ± 41.5 221.7 ± 49.2 159.6 ± 52.9 59.5 0.000 0.37 0.00