Table 1.
Hierarchical clustering analysis: mean correlation values are given for clusters identified from the generalized correlation matrices of EF–(0Ca-CaM), EF–(2Ca-CaM), and EF–(4Ca-CaM) with different cut heights h
| EF–(0Ca-CaM) | EF–(2Ca-CaM) | EF–(4Ca-CaM) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.17 ≤ h < 7.1 | 0.44 ± 0.10 | 0.45 ± 0.10 | 0.46 ± 0.10 |
| 0.60 ± 0.08 | 0.60 ± 0.07 | 0.60 ± 0.08 | |
| 0.44 ± 0.10 | 0.45 ± 0.10 | 0.46 ± 0.10 | |
| 5 ≤ h < 5.17 | 0.60 ± 0.08 | 0.60 ± 0.07 | 0.56 ± 0.08 |
| 0.46 ± 0.10 | 0.46 ± 0.10 | 0.46 ± 0.10 | |
| 4.4 ≤ h < 5 | 0.46 ± 0.16 | 0.47 ± 0.22 | 0.56 ± 0.08 |
| 0.60 ± 0.08 | 0.60 ± 0.07 | 0.71 ± 0.07 |
For hopt = 5 two, two, and three clusters are identified for EF–(0Ca-CaM), EF–(2Ca-CaM), and EF–(4Ca-CaM), respectively, which display significantly different mean correlation values.