Table 4.
Logistic set regression: UAI at the most recent encounter (N = 413)
| Model | −2 log L | Overall model | Change in −2 log L | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Set 1: demographic and cultural set | 400.28 | X2(7) = 8.57 | ||
| Set 2: psychological set | 390.60 | X2(9) = 18.26* | 9.68* | |
| Set 3: situational set | 359.24 | X2(14) = 49.62** | 31.36** | |
| Final model | Coefficient | Wald X2 | Odds ratio | 95% CI |
|
| ||||
| Set 1: demographic and cultural characteristics | ||||
| Intercept | −1.13 | 1.28 | ||
| Education level | −0.15 | .26 | 0.86 | 0.48–1.54 |
| Income | 0.14 | 2.04 | 1.15 | 0.95–1.39 |
| Age | −0.00 | 0.01 | 1.00 | 0.97–1.03 |
| HIV positive status | −0.01 | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.48–2.05 |
| Brazilian | 0.01 | 0.00 | 1.01 | 0.50–2.03 |
| Dominican | 0.47 | 1.98 | 1.60 | 0.83–3.08 |
| U.S. acculturation | −0.15 | 0.47 | 0.86 | 0.56–1.32 |
| Set 2: psychological characteristics | ||||
| Self-efficacy for condom use | −0.57 | 14.05** | 0.57 | 0.42–0.76 |
| Depression | 0.03 | 0.02 | 1.03 | 0.67–1.59 |
| Set 3: situational characteristics | ||||
| Closeness with partner | 0.31 | 6.17* | 1.37 | 1.07–1.75 |
| Concern about STIs | −0.62 | 4.30* | 0.54 | 0.30–0.97 |
| Drug use in encounter | 0.55 | 2.77 | 1.74 | 0.91–3.33 |
| Sexual desire in encounter | 0.21 | 1.57 | 1.23 | 0.89–1.70 |
| Seroconcordance | 0.70 | 5.58* | 2.02 | 1.13–3.63 |
P<.05;
P<.01