Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 29;587(Pt 12):2949–2961. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.169284

Table 1.

Trial-by-trial variability of movement dynamics during and after motor adaptation with tDCS

Block N4 Block F1 Block F4 Block N5
Summed error (m) Active 1.0 ± 0.1 2.0 ± 0.2* 1.0 ± 0.1 3.1 ± 0.4*
Sham 1.0 ± 0.1 2.1 ± 0.2* 0.9 ± 0.1 2.4 ± 0.3*
Signed error (m) Active 0.11 ± 0.01 0.17 ± 0.02* 0.13 ± 0.01* 0.18 ± 0.02*
Sham 0.11 ± 0.01 0.17 ± 0.01* 0.14 ± 0.01* 0.16 ± 0.01*
Movement time (ms) Active 76 ± 8 108 ± 9* 83 ± 8 113 ± 8*
Sham 79 ± 4 112 ± 9* 88 ± 8 107 ± 10*

Values are mean s.d. values ±s.e.m. (n= 14) measured across 24 trials in each block and subject.

*

Significantly different from Block N4 (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between active vs. sham tDCS for any variable in any block.