Table 1.
Block N4 | Block F1 | Block F4 | Block N5 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Summed error (m) | Active | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.2* | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.4* |
Sham | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.2* | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.3* | |
Signed error (m) | Active | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.02* | 0.13 ± 0.01* | 0.18 ± 0.02* |
Sham | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.01* | 0.14 ± 0.01* | 0.16 ± 0.01* | |
Movement time (ms) | Active | 76 ± 8 | 108 ± 9* | 83 ± 8 | 113 ± 8* |
Sham | 79 ± 4 | 112 ± 9* | 88 ± 8 | 107 ± 10* |
Values are mean s.d. values ±s.e.m. (n= 14) measured across 24 trials in each block and subject.
Significantly different from Block N4 (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between active vs. sham tDCS for any variable in any block.