Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 22;96(8):3379–3389. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.12.3956

Table 2.

Evaluation of the SCT algorithm versus manual thresholding

Measure Noise SCT Manual
Accuracy STD 1.00 (3.91 × 10−4) 1.00 (2.54 × 10−4)
10 × 9.97 × 10−1 (6.45 × 10−3) 9.99 × 10−1 (5.87 × 10−4)
FP rate STD 3.19 × 10−4 (4.22 × 10−4) 4.15 × 10−5 (7.14 × 10−5)
10 × 2.20 × 10−3 (6.63 × 10−3) 1.52 × 10−4 (5.21 × 10−5)
TP rate STD 9.67 × 10−1 (6.18 × 10−2) 9.16 × 10−1 (1.40 × 10−1)
10 × 4.49 × 10−1 (1.38 × 10−1) 4.64 × 10−1 (5.96 × 10−2)
P(error) STD 4.00 × 10−5 (3.90 × 10−4) 2.17 × 10−5 (2.54 × 10−4)
10 × 3.41 × 10−4 (6.43 × 10−3) 1.37 × 10−4 (5.87 × 10−4)

Ten image stacks were simulated for each noise level and the average accuracy, TP and FP rates, and P(error) of each thresholding technique across the simulations is summarized. Standard deviations are shown within parentheses.