Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 16;10(6):R66. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-6-r66

Table 2.

Comparison of microarray and RT-qPCR results for housekeeping or stable genes

ID Genome ID Name Maximum change ARRAY Maximum change QPCR Function
LQ0AAB30YA12FM1.SCF [Esi0298_0008] Dyn 0.23 0.77 Dynein
CL1914Contig1 [Esi0021_0024] ARP2.1 0.22 0.44 Actin related protein
CL3Contig2 [Esi0387_0021] EF1A 0.08 0.46 Elongation factor 1 alpha
CL8Contig12 [Esi0053_0059] TUA 0.57 0.91 Alpha tubulin
CL1073Contig1 [Esi0054_0059] UBCE 0.22 0.38 Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme
CL29Contig4 [Esi0302_0019] UBQ 0.18 0.82 Ubiquitin
CL461Contig1 [Esi0072_0068] R26S 0.22 n/a Ribosomal protein S26

The table displays the maximum log2-ratio between any stress and the control condition for both the microarray and the RT-qPCR analysis. No RT-qPCR value is available for R26S, as this gene was used for normalization of the RT-qPCR samples. ID corresponds to the name of the sequence on the array.