Table 2.
Ctl HCD | GHS HCD | Ctl LCD | GHS LCD | |
Humeri (cortical bone) | ||||
Failure stress (MPa) | 202 ± 5 | 193 ± 9 | 118 ± 10* | 148 ± 8†‡ |
Failure strain | 0.064 ± 0.003 | 0.044 ± 0.002* | 0.099 ± 0.004* | 0.065 ± 0.004†‡ |
Modulus (MPa) | 3253 ± 165 | 4633 ± 461* | 1164 ± 96* | 2278 ± 215†‡ |
Toughness (J/mm2) | 7.8 ± 0.4 | 4.6 ± 0.3* | 8.5 ± 0.9 | 6.2 ± 0.3†‡ |
Fifth lumbar vertebrae (trabecular bone) | ||||
Failure stress (MPa) | 19.8 ± 1.7 | 16.3 ± 1.5 | 7.5 ± 0.7* | 5.8 ± 0.7† |
Failure strain | 0.078 ± 0.007 | 0.070 ± 0.006 | 0.093 ± 0.018 | 0.059 ± 0.009‡ |
Modulus (MPa) | 251 ± 6 | 238 ± 24 | 88 ± 11* | 89 ± 6† |
Toughness (J/mm2) | 0.87 ± 0.12 | 0.62 ± 0.9 | 0.37 ± 0.7* | 0.23 ± 0.6† |
Data are mean ± SE; n = 8 all groups.
* Different from Ctl eating HCD, p < 0.001.
† Different from GHS eating HCD, p < 0.001.
‡ Different from Ctl eating LCD, p < 0.001.
Ctl, control rats; GHS, genetic hypercalciuric stone forming rats; HCD, high Ca diet,1.2% Ca; LCD, low Ca diet, 0.02% Ca.