Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun;11(3):242–249. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2009-002

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Job-specific magnetic field exposure estimates adjusted using job modules versus unadjusted estimates from job exposure matrices (JEMs). The percentage of jobs in which subjects were exposed to ≥3.0 mG, when adjusted using job modules, increased from 4% to 7% relative to the JEM value.