Table 4.
Linear regression results for HRV response at visit 2.
| HRV | Model | Variables | B | p-value | adjusted R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMSSD | 1 | Age + sex + ethnicity | 0.008 | ||
| Age | −0.001 | 0.922 | |||
| Sex | −0.130 | 0.015 | |||
| Ethnicity | 0.009 | 0.765 | |||
| 2 | Model 1 + visit 1 RMSSD response | 0.064 | |||
| Visit 1 RMSSD response | 0.262 | < 0.001 | |||
| 3 | Model 1 + visit 1 RMSSD resting level | 0.003 | |||
| Visit 1 RMSSD resting level | −0.0003 | 0.443 | |||
| 4 | Model 1 + BMI at visit 1 | 0.005 | |||
| BMI at visit 1 | −0.0001 | 0.943 | |||
| 5 | Model 1 + BMI change | 0.009 | |||
| BMI change* | −0.006 | 0.372 | |||
| 6 | Model 1 + WC at visit 1 | 0.005 | |||
| WC at visit 1 | −0.001 | 0.733 | |||
| 7 | Model 1 + WC change | 0.004 | |||
| WC change† | −0.001 | 0.882 | |||
| 8 | Model 1 + Father's education level | 0.006 | |||
| Father's education level | −0.002 | 0.712 | |||
|
| |||||
| HF | 1 | Age + sex + ethnicity | 0.011 | ||
| Age | 0.006 | 0.703 | |||
| Sex | −0.13 | 0.010 | |||
| Ethnicity | 0.080 | 0.362 | |||
| 2 | Model 1 + visit 1 HF response | 0.024 | |||
| Visit 1 HF response | 0.16 | 0.002 | |||
| 3 | Model 1 + visit 1 HF resting level | 0.005 | |||
| Visit 1 HF resting level | −0.0002 | 0.333 | |||
| 4 | Model 1 + BMI at visit 1 | 0.008 | |||
| BMI at visit 1* | −0.0008 | 0.886 | |||
| 5 | Model 1 + BMI change | 0.012 | |||
| BMI change | −0.022 | 0.286 | |||
| 6 | Model 1 + WC at visit 1 | 0.009 | |||
| WC at visit 1 | −0.003 | 0.649 | |||
| 7 | Model 1 + WC change | 0.008 | |||
| WC change† | −0.002 | 0.919 | |||
| 8 | Model 1 + Father's education level | 0.014 | |||
| Father's education level | −0.027 | 0.156 | |||
BMI change= BMI at visit 2 – BMI at visit 1
WC change= WC at visit 2 - WC at visit 1
Responses of RMSSD and HF to stress were indexed by the (stress-rest)/rest ratio.
BMI= body mass index; HF= high frequency power; HRV= heart rate variability; RMSSD= root mean square of successive differences of normal RR intervals; WC= waist circumference.