Skip to main content
editorial
. 2009 Jul 28;13(4):343–403. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7

Table 6.

 

Year of publication First author Groups Number of patients Follow-up duration (months) Follow-up number (percentage with physical examination) Recurrence (%) Chronic pain (%)
2000 Kingsnorth et al. [154] Mesh-plug
vs.
Lichtenstein
141
68/73
14 days 100% No data No data
2002 Kingsnorth et al. [155] PHS
vs.
Lichtenstein
206
103/103
12 98% 0% PHS
2% Lichtenstein
No data
2005 Nienhuijs et al. [218] PHS
vs.
Lichtenstein
vs.
Mesh-plug
334
111/110/143
15 95.8% 2.5%
No differences
43.3%
No differences
2006 Dogru et al. [83] Kugel
vs.
Lichtenstein
140
70/70
24 99% 0% Kugel
1.4% Lich
No data
2006 Sanjay et al. [270] PHS
vs.
Lichtenstein
64
31/33
6 weeks 94% 3% PHS
0% lich
No data
2007 Adamonis et al. [7] Trabucco
vs.
Mesh-plug
100
50/50
21 57% 4% Trab
4% M-P
30% Trab
19% M-P
2007 Frey et al. [103] Mesh-plug
vs.
Lichtenstein
597
297/298
12 85.3% 0.3% M-P
0% Lich
14.2% Lich
7% M-P