Table 6.
Year of publication | First author | Groups | Number of patients | Follow-up duration (months) | Follow-up number (percentage with physical examination) | Recurrence (%) | Chronic pain (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 | Kingsnorth et al. [154] | Mesh-plug vs. Lichtenstein |
141 68/73 |
14 days | 100% | No data | No data |
2002 | Kingsnorth et al. [155] | PHS vs. Lichtenstein |
206 103/103 |
12 | 98% | 0% PHS 2% Lichtenstein |
No data |
2005 | Nienhuijs et al. [218] | PHS vs. Lichtenstein vs. Mesh-plug |
334 111/110/143 |
15 | 95.8% | 2.5% No differences |
43.3% No differences |
2006 | Dogru et al. [83] | Kugel vs. Lichtenstein |
140 70/70 |
24 | 99% | 0% Kugel 1.4% Lich |
No data |
2006 | Sanjay et al. [270] | PHS vs. Lichtenstein |
64 31/33 |
6 weeks | 94% | 3% PHS 0% lich |
No data |
2007 | Adamonis et al. [7] | Trabucco vs. Mesh-plug |
100 50/50 |
21 | 57% | 4% Trab 4% M-P |
30% Trab 19% M-P |
2007 | Frey et al. [103] | Mesh-plug vs. Lichtenstein |
597 297/298 |
12 | 85.3% | 0.3% M-P 0% Lich |
14.2% Lich 7% M-P |