Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 3.
Published in final edited form as: Res Nurs Health. 2009 Jun;32(3):260–273. doi: 10.1002/nur.20320

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Number of Dyads Who Improved Dyad Congruence and Surrogate Decision Making Confidence by Group

Note. “Improved” included the combination of congruent dyad + confident surrogate (score ≥ 3); “Not Improved” included three combinations, incongruent dyad + unconfident surrogate (score ≤ 2), incongruent dyad + confident surrogate, and congruent dyad + unconfident surrogate.