Table 2.

Regressions on outcome variables

Dependent variable	Independent variables	beta/B a	T/Wald a	p	R2/Nagel-kerke R2 a
Self-esteem b	Social anxiety c	−0.40	−3.50	.001	.32
	Shame d	−0.27	−2.52	.014
	Devaluing work/education	−0.03	−0.34	.73
	Ingroup comparisons	0.13	1.27	.21
	Blaming discrimination	0.04	.38	.71
Hopelessness e	Social anxiety c	0.44	3.97	<.001	.37
	Shame d	0.21	2.03	.046
	Devaluing work/education	0.19	2.06	.043
	Ingroup comparisons	−0.10	−1.05	.30
	Blaming discrimination	0.05	0.48	.64
Social Performance f	Social anxiety c	0.09	0.76	.45	.30
	Shame d	0.10	0.92	.36
	Devaluing work/education	−0.14	−1.45	.15
	Ingroup comparisons	−0.54	−5.39	<.001
	Blaming discrimination	0.03	0.31	.76
Seating Distance g	Social anxiety c	0.01	0.29	.59	.12
	Shame d	−0.01	0.04	.85
	Devaluing work/education	−0.06	0.14	.71
	Ingroup comparisons	0.24	4.02	.045
	Blaming discrimination	0.09	0.51	.48

^aLinear regressions on self-esteem, hopelessness and social performance; and logistic regression on seating distance (close versus far)

^bRosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965)

^cLiebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (Liebowitz, 1987)

^dTest of Self-Conscious Affect-3 (Tangney et al., 2000)

^eBeck’s Hopelessness Scale (Beck et al., 1974)

^fMaryland Assessment of Social Competence (Bellack et al., 2006)

^gSeating distance from a talkative “normal” person