Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 30;169(1):105–112. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn287

Table 6.

Comparison of Self-reported Cycle Length With Actual Cycle Length, of Actual Cycle Length in Cycles 1 and 2, and of the Timing of the Monitor Peak in Cycle 1 Versus Cycle 2 Among Participants in the BioCycle Study, Buffalo, New York, 2005–2007

No. of Days’ Difference Self-reported Cycle Length vs. Actual Cycle Length Actual Cycle Length (Cycle 1 vs. Cycle 2) Day of Monitor Peak (Cycle 1 vs. Cycle 2)a Days From End of Cycle of Monitor Peak (Cycle 1 vs. Cycle 2)a
Cycle 1 Cycle 2
No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %
0 33 13.8 36 17.2 21 10.1 30 20.3 37 27.0
1 49 20.4 52 24.9 55 26.3 43 29.1 45 32.9
2 54 22.5 38 18.2 32 15.3 21 14.2 20 14.6
≥3 104 43.3 83 39.7 101 48.3 54 36.5 35 25.6
Unknownb 9 23 23 11
a

Among 148 women who reached peak fertility in cycles 1 and 2.

b

Among women with any monitor data, the actual cycle length was unknown for 9 women for cycle 1 and 23 women for cycle 2; 11 women who peaked in both cycles were missing cycle length data.