Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 23;19(2):206–211. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp008

Table 2.

Changes in smoking prevalence (n = 107; self-reported and combined self report and cotinine) and cigarette consumption per day (n = 49) among Cork bar workers; pre- and post-ban comparisons

Smoking prevalence
Cigarette consumption
Total Pre-ban Post-ban Difference N Pre-ban Mean Post-ban Within-subject Between-subject
N (%) N (%) from pre- to (SD) Mean (SD) changes (pre- differencesb
smokers smokers post-ban P-valuea versus post-ban) Pb P**
Current smoker (self report) 107 55 (51.4) 52 (48.6) 0.508 49 18.1 (11.8) 13.9 (8.5) <0.001
Current smoker (combined self report and cotinine) 107 60 (56.1) 55 (51.4) 0.125
Sexc
    Male 76 39 (51.3) 35 (46.1) 0.22 32 18.2 (11.7) 14.2 (8.2) <0.001 0.823
    Female 31 21 (67.7) 20 (64.5) 1.00 17 17.8 (12.4) 13.3 (9.3)
Age groupc
    18–28 years 53 38 (72.0) 35 (66.0) 0.38 30 14.8 (6.9) 12.5 (7.7) 0.001 0.20
    29–38 years 24 12 (50.0) 11 (45.8) 1.00 10 23.6 (15.8) 14.6 (10.2)
    39–48 years 18 7 (38.9) 7 (38.9) 1.00 7 23.4 (18.5) 18.4 (9.9)
    49–58 years 7 2 (28.6) 2 (28.6) 1.00 2 20.0 (14.1) 15.0 (7.0)
    >59 years 5 0 (00.0) 0 (00.0) 0 0.0 0.0
Occupational classc
    Manager (Bar owner/ bar manager) 45 19 (42.2) 18 (40.0) 1.00 17 17.0 (13.0) 13.0 (9.4) <0.001 0.617
    Staff (permanent/ temp. bar workers) 62 41 (66.1) 37 (59.7) 0.22 32 18.6 (11.3) 14.3 (8.2)

a: P-values for smoking prevalence were calculated using Mc Nemar chi-squared test

b: P-values for cigarette consumption were calculated using GLM

c: smoking prevalence by sex, age & occupation are for combined SR & cotinine