. 2009 Jul 14;8:157. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-157

Table 3.

Density-dependence of relative sampling efficiency of alternative traps for An. gambiae s.l. by generalized estimating equations (GEE)

Alternative collection method		Parameter	Estimate [95%CI]	P

*Versus CDC-light trap reference method*
Furvela
	Experiment 1	Intercept	1.07 [0.70, 1.44]	< 0.001
Ifakara A
	Experiment 1	Intercept	2.12 [1.42, 2.82]	< 0.001
		Log₁₀(CDC-LT)	-0.90 [-1.22, -0.57]	< 0.001
	Experiment 2	Intercept	1.05 [0.59, 1.51]	< 0.001
		Log₁₀(CDC-LT)	-0.39 [-0.57, -0.21]	< 0.001
Ifakara B
	Experiment 1	Intercept	3.31 [1.17, 5.45]	0.002
		Log₁₀(CDC-LT)	-1.27 [-2.35, -0.19]	0.021
	Experiment 2	Intercept	2.10 [1.22, 2.99]	< 0.001
		Log₁₀(CDC-LT)	-0.74 [-1.09, -0.39]	< 0.001
	Experiment 3	NA	NA	NA
Light trap
	Experiment 2	NA	NA	NA
*Versus human landing catch reference method*
Furvela
	Experiment 1	NA	NA	NA
Ifakara A
	Experiment 1	NA	NA	NA
		NA	NA	NA
	Experiment 2	Intercept	1.69 [0.86, 2.52]	< 0.001
		Log₁₀(HLC)	-0.71 [-1.09, 0.33]	< 0.001
Ifakara B
	Experiment 1	NA	NA	NA
		NA	NA	NA
	Experiment 2	intercept	0.64 [0.46, 0.81]	< 0.001
	Experiment 3	Intercept	1.06 [0.78, 1.33]	< 0.001
		Log₁₀(HLC)	-0.75 [-0.99, 0.50]	< 0.001
Light trap
	Experiment 2	Intercept	4.65 [1.58, 7.71]	0.003
		Log₁₀(HLC)	-1.71 [-3.243, -0.178]	0.029