Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 16;20(9):1023–1028. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0866-1

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of the 266 subjects assigned to receive an incontinence pessary

Characteristic N (%) or mean (SD), range
Subject characteristics
Age 49 (11), 19 to 81
BMI (kg/m2) 29.5 (6.8), 18.0 to 58.6
BMI normal (<25 kg/m2) 75 (28%)
BMI overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2) 83 (31%)
BMI obese (≥30 kg/m2) 107 (40%)
Parous 250 (94%)
Prior hysterectomy 59 (22%)
Prior surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse 13 (5%)
Prior surgical treatment for urinary incontinence 7 (3%)
POPQ parameters
Stage 0 26 (10%)
Stage 1 127 (49%)
Stage 2 104 (41%)
TVL (cm) 9.5 (1.1), 6 to 12
C (cm) −7.2 (2.1), −12 to −5
D (cm) −7.1 (4.9), −12 to −1
GH (cm) 3.1 (1.0), 1 to 7
GH/TVL ratio 0.33 (0.11), 0.09 to 0.88
Pessary variablesa
Final type of pessary
Incontinence ring with support 122 (52%)
Incontinence dish 113 (48%)
Final pessary size (diameter, mm) 72 (8), 51 to 102
Plan to use pessary (final status)
Yes 235 (93%)
No 20 (8%)

aPessary variables are provided for the final fitted pessary (with a maximum of three possible visits to fit the pessary)