TABLE 2.
Adjusted model 1 | Adjusted model 2 | Adjusted model 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRRb | 95% CIc | IRRb | 95% CIc | IRRb | 95% CIc | |
Survey wave | ||||||
Baseline | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
Follow–up | 1.01 | 0.92–1.11 | 0.94 | 0.86–1.02 | 0.97 | 0.89–1.06 |
Sociodemographics | ||||||
Nationality | ||||||
Jewish | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
Israeli Arabs | 1.23 | 1.11–1.35 | 1.28 | 1.15–1.42 | 1.21 | 1.10–1.33 |
Gender | ||||||
Male | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
Female | 1.09 | 1.00–1.19 | 1.08 | 1.00–1.17 | 1.06 | 0.98–1.14 |
Age, in years | ||||||
18–24 | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
25–34 | 1.02 | 0.88–1.18 | 1.03 | 0.88–1.19 | 1.02 | 0.88–1.17 |
35–44 | 1.19 | 1.02–1.39 | 1.15 | 0.98–1.33 | 1.13 | 0.96–1.31 |
45–54 | 1.07 | 0.90–1.28 | 1.06 | 0.89–1.25 | 1.03 | 0.86–1.23 |
55–64 | 1.02 | 0.83–1.23 | 1.03 | 0.84–1.22 | 0.99 | 0.82–1.18 |
≥65 | 0.89 | 0.70–1.10 | 0.94 | 0.76–1.15 | 0.93 | 0.74–1.13 |
Educational attainment | ||||||
>High school | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
≤ High school | 1.03 | 0.94–1.13 | 1.05 | 0.96–1.14 | 1.03 | 0.94–1.12 |
Marital status | ||||||
Married | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
Single/living with partner | 1.10 | 0.95–1.25 | 1.13 | 0.98–1.29 | 1.15 | 1.00–1.31 |
Divorced/separated | 0.98 | 0.80–1.16 | 1.00 | 0.82–1.18 | 1.02 | 0.85–1.21 |
Widowed | 0.85 | 0.68–1.04 | 0.91 | 0.72–1.15 | 0.97 | 0.78–1.18 |
Household income | ||||||
Above average | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
Below or at average | 1.24 | 1.13–1.38 | 1.20 | 1.08–1.33 | 1.16 | 1.05–1.28 |
Religiosity | ||||||
Secular | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
Traditional | 1.09 | 0.98–1.21 | 1.05 | 0.96–1.16 | 1.05 | 0.95–1.16 |
Religious | 1.07 | 0.94–1.21 | 1.07 | 0.94–1.20 | 1.09 | 0.97–1.22 |
Ultrareligious | 0.98 | 0.70–1.28 | 1.05 | 0.75–1.36 | 1.06 | 0.78–1.38 |
Perceived social support | ||||||
High | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
Medium | 1.18 | 1.05–1.33 | 1.13 | 1.00–1.28 | 1.14 | 1.01–1.27 |
Low | 1.39 | 1.24–1.57 | 1.35 | 1.21–1.50 | 1.33 | 1.19–1.49 |
Exposure to terrorism | ||||||
Any direct exposure to terrorism | ||||||
No | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - | ||
Yes | 1.09 | 0.99–1.22 | 1.08 | 0.98–1.19 | ||
Any threat from terrorism | ||||||
No | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - | ||
Yes | 1.00 | 0.92–1.09 | 1.00 | 0.91–1.10 | ||
Any economic loss from terrorism | ||||||
No | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - | ||
Yes | 1.18 | 1.06–1.30 | 1.13 | 1.02–1.23 | ||
Loss of psychosocial resources | ||||||
Low | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - | ||
Medium | 1.24 | 1.10–1.39 | 1.22 | 1.09–1.37 | ||
High | 1.59 | 1.41–1.79 | 1.48 | 1.31–1.67 | ||
Gain of psychosocial resources | ||||||
Low | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - | ||
Medium | 0.96 | 0.86–1.07 | 0.93 | 0.83–1.03 | ||
High | 1.01 | 0.91–1.12 | 0.96 | 0.87–1.06 | ||
Psychopathology | ||||||
Probable PTSD | ||||||
No | 1.00 | - | ||||
Yes | 1.55 | 1.42–1.68 |
Results of the negative binomial portion of the zero-inflated negative binomial model, fit among those with a non-zero total depression scale score; the same covariates were significantly associated with having a non-zero depression scale score in the logistic regression model portion of the zero-inflated negative binomial models as in the negative binomial portion, with the following exceptions: female gender and educational attainment of high school or lower was significantly associated with a non–zero depression score in all 3 adjusted logistic regression models, while average or below average household income was not associated with depression in adjusted models 2 and 3; being traditionally religious was associated with a non-zero depression score in adjusted model 1.
Incidence rate ratio.
Bootstrapped confidence intervals.