Skip to main content
. 2008 Jun 26;29(10):1944–1949. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn154

Table V.

ORs and frequencies by case–control status for 14 PPARA haplotypes relative to all other haplotypes among postmenopausal women in LIBCSP

Haplotype numbera rs135542 rs1800206 rs4253623 rs4253699 rs4253755 rs4253760 Control n (%) Case n (%) OR (95% CI)b
1 A C A C A G 55 (5.5) 53 (5.3) 1.01 (0.49, 2.09)
2 A C A C A T 18 (1.9) 32 (3.2) 2.03 (0.71, 5.82)
3 A C A C G G 18 (1.8) 14 (1.4) 0.97 (0.23, 4.18)
4 A C A C G T 55 (5.5) 53 (5.2) 0.89 (0.40, 1.99)
5 A C A T A G 25 (2.5) 32 (3.2) 1.64 (0.61, 4.46)
6 A C A T G G 19 (1.9) 36 (3.6) 2.83 (0.93, 8.65)
7 A C A T G T 414 (41.7) 396 (39.2) 0.92 (0.70, 1.20)
8 A C G C G T 13 (1.5) 10 (1.0) 0.77 (0.12, 4.91)
9 A C G T G T 104 (10.5) 103 (10.2) 0.97 (0.59, 1.59)
10 A G A C G G 11 (1.1) 30 (3.0) 5.02 (1.45, 17.39)
11 A G A T G G 13 (1.3) 8 (0.8) 0.47 (0.08, 2.83)
12 G C A C G T 15 (1.5) 8 (0.8) 0.42 (0.05, 3.55)
13 G C A T G G 11 (1.1) 11 (1.1) 1.07 (0.13, 8.67)
14 G C A T G T 173 (17.4) 182 (18.0) 1.19 (0.79, 1.80)
a

Haplotypes with frequency ≥0.01, minor alleles in bold.

b

Adjusted for age, measured in 5-year age intervals.