Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 19.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 19;360(8):753–764. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809329

Table 3.

Percentage of Patients in the Validation Cohort and in the Derivation-plus-Validation Cohort with an Ideal, Underestimated, or Overestimated Dose of Warfarin, as Estimated with the Pharmacogenetic Algorithm, Clinical Algorithm, and Fixed-Dose Approach in Patients Requiring Low, Intermediate, or High Actual Doses of Warfarin for a Therapeutic Effect.*

Actual Dose Required No. of
Patients
Ideal Dose Underestimation Overestimation
Percent P Value Percent P Value Percent P Value
Validation cohort only
≤21 mg/wk 324
 Pharmacogenetic approach 33.0 0.008, <0.001 4.6 0.002, <0.001 62.3 <0.001, <0.001
 Clinical approach 25.9 <0.001 0.6 0.50 73.5 <0.001
 Fixed-dose approach 0 0 100
>21 mg/wk to <49 mg/wk 560
 Pharmacogenetic approach 54.6 0.72, 0.31 26.8 0.14, <0.001 18.6 0.25, <0.001
 Clinical approach 53.6 0.55 29.8 <0.001 16.6 <0.001
 Fixed-dose approach 51.6 9.1 39.3
≥49 mg/wk 125
 Pharmacogenetic approach 36.8 <0.001, <0.001 63.2 <0.001, <0.001 0 1.00, 1.00
 Clinical approach 9.6 <0.001 89.6 <0.001 0.8 1.00
 Fixed-dose approach 0 100 0
Derivation-plus-validation cohort
≤21 mg/wk 1711
 Pharmacogenetic approach 35.0 <0.001, <0.001 5.4 <0.001, <0.001 59.7 <0.001, <0.001
 Clinical approach 24.0 <0.001 1.2 <0.001 74.8 <0.001
 Fixed-dose approach 0 0 100
>21 mg/wk to <49 mg/wk 2716
 Pharmacogenetic approach 55.9 0.02, 0.08 25.9 <0.001, <0.001 18.2 <0.001, <0.001
 Clinical approach 53.3 0.80 31.0 <0.001 15.6 <0.001
 Fixed-dose approach 53.7 8.9 37.4
≥49 mg/wk 625
 Pharmacogenetic approach 32.8 <0.001, <0.001 66.7 <0.001, <0.001 0.5 1.00, 0.25
 Clinical approach 13.3 <0.001 86.2 <0.001 0.5 0.25
 Fixed-dose approach 0 100 0
*

The ideal dose was defined as a predicted dose that was within 20% of the actual stable therapeutic dose of warfarin, underestimation was defined as a predicted dose that was at least 20% lower than the actual dose, and overestimation was defined as a predicted dose that was at least 20% higher than the actual dose.

For the pharmacogenetic approach, the first P value is for the comparison with the clinical approach, and the second for the comparison with the fixed-dose approach. The P value for the clinical approach is for the comparison with the fixed-dose approach.