Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Mar 13;48(4):755–765. doi: 10.1021/ci8000259

Table 1.

An Example of Ligand Set Similarities and Their Variation with Fingerprint Typea

DHFR Is the Reference Ligand Set

Daylight fingerprint ECFP_4 fingerprint


rank ligand-set
annotation
E-value rank ligand-set
annotation
E-value
1 GART 8.6 E–79 1 GART 1.3 E–264
2 folylpolyglutamate synthetase 4.4 E–48 2 thymidylate synthetase 8.5 E–142
3 thymidylate synthetase 6.6 E–48 3 folylpolyglutamate synthetase 7.5 E–132

GART Is the Reference Ligand Set

Daylight fingerprint ECFP_4 fingerprint


rank ligand-set annotation E-value rank ligand-set annotation E-value

1 DHFR 8.6 E–79 1 DHFR 1.3 E–264
2 thymidylate synthetase 5.2 E–66 2 thymidylate synthetase 5.4 E–256
3 folylpolyglutamate synthetase 3.6 E–09
a

Ligand sets similar to dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (GART) ligands (E-value ≤ 1). SEA was used to compare the sets of ligands; the sets were drawn from the MDDR. A Tanimoto cutoff of 0.55 for the Daylight fingerprints and of 0.35 for the ECFP_4 fingerprints was used.