Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 10.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jul 15;14(14):4543–4549. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4230

Table II.

Diplotype Groupings in the initial exploratory analysis

- Chromosome 1 - - Chromosome 2 - Docetaxel
Population
Frequency
(%)
Docetaxel
and
Thalidomide
Population
Frequency
(%)


Diplotype 1236C>T 2677G>T/A 3435C>T 1236C>T 2677G>T/A 3435C>T
Diplotype 1 C G C C G C 7 (33.3) 4 (9.5)
Diplotype 2 C G C * * * 5 (23.8) 10 (23.8)
Diplotype 3 C G C T T T 4 (19.0) 11 (26.2)
Diplotype 4 T T T * * * 3 (14.3) 9 (21.4)
Diplotype 5 T T T T T T 2 (9.5) 8 (19.0)


Diplotype 6 - G C - G C 7 (33.3) 6 (13.6)
Diplotype 7 - G C - 3 (14.3) 8 (18.2)
Diplotype 8 - G C - T T 6 (28.6) 14 (31.8)
Diplotype 9 - T T - 3 (14.3) 6 (13.6)
Diplotype 10 - T T - T T 2 (9.5) 10 (22.7)
*

Any combination of alleles that is not mutually exclusive with another diplotype consisting of all three SNPs.

Any combination of alleles that is not mutually exclusive with another diplotype consisting of only the 2677 and 3435 SNPs.

-

This SNP was excluded in the Diplotypes 6–10 calculations.

Diplotypes were grouped based on whether or not the patient carried a fully wild-type or fully variant haplotype. This approach was based on a report by Kimchi-Sarfaty et al. where it was noted that protein affinity and folding was different between these haplotypes (15).