Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 10.
Published in final edited form as: Psychosom Med. 2007 Aug 27;69(7):692–699. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3180cc2ec7

TABLE 3.

Analysis of Variance of Subjective and PSG Sleep Outcomes With Attachment Style,a Marital Status, and the Marital Status by Attachment Style Interaction

Sleep Outcome F Statistic df
PSQI
    Attachment style (A) .13 1, 89
    Marital status (MS) .10 2, 89
    A × MS .84 2, 89
Total sleep duration (min)
    Attachment style (A) .01 1, 107
    Marital status (MS) .81 2, 107
    A × MS .25 2, 107
Sleep efficiencyb
    Attachment style (A) .64 1, 107
    Marital status (MS) 4.08* 2, 107
    A × MS .50 2, 107
Sleep latencyb
    Attachment style (A) 2.74 1, 107
    Marital status (MS) 3.39* 2, 107
    A × MS 1.29 2, 107
% Stage 3 to 4 activityc
    Attachment style (A) 4.83* 1, 107
    Marital status (MS) 1.61 2, 107
    A × MS 7.10** 2, 107
    REM densityc
    Attachment style (A) .97 1, 107
    Marital status (MS) .50 2, 107
    A × MS .91 2, 107
REM latencyc
    Attachment style (A) .33 1, 107
    Marital status (MS) .73 2, 107
    A × MS 1.06 2, 107

PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; REM = rapid eye movement.

a

Preoccupied or fearful-avoidant versus secure or dismissing-avoidant. All analyses statistically adjusted for age, baseline depressive symptoms, and length of time between psychosocial assessment and PSG. Analyses and significance levels are based on b log-transformed or c square-root transformed data, respectively.

*

p < .05

**

p < .01.