Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 10;297(2):F292–F300. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00196.2009

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

UT-A1 activation exhibits no selectivity for syntaxins. In contrast to AQP2, in the presence of snapin both syntaxin-3 and syntaxin-4 weakly stimulated UT-A1 activity (P < 0.01) to the same extent. In the absence of snapin, this stimulation disappeared.