Skip to main content
. 2009 May 27;102(2):941–952. doi: 10.1152/jn.00222.2009

TABLE 1.

Plastic changes in ICc and Al after p-cond with or without drugs

Amount of Changes at 60 min After p-cond
Groups Recording Site Response Increase at MT + 10 dB, % BW Increase at MT + 10 dB, kHz Threshold Decrease at BF, dB Background Discharge Increase, % BF shift at CSu + 5 kHz
1. P-cond with saline ICc 45.8 ± 6.8 (34) 2.0 ± 0.1 5.1 ± 0.3 20 ± 2.9* −1.0 ± 0.1 (8/12)*
Al 56.7 ± 3.4 (23)** 3.8 ± 0.4** 6.1 ± 0.8 14 ± 4.1 −1.0 ± 0.1 (5/10)*
2. P-cond with Atr to ICc ICc 38.0 ± 9.5 (19)§ 1.7 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.5 12 ± 2.6 0 (19/19)
Atr to Al Al 48.6 ± 5.1 (12) 3.2 ± 0.3 5.4 ± 0.7 10 ± 9.6 0 (14/14)
3. P-cond with Mus to Al ICc 36.3 ± 4.0 (17)§ 1.9 ± 0.2 5.2 ± 0.5* 21 ± 2.8 0 (17/17)
4. p-cond with Mus to Sl ICc 42.3 ± 5.7 (15) 2.1 ± 0.1 5.0 ± 0.5* 13 ± 3.3 0 (15/15)
Al 58.2 ± 4.6 (16)** 3.7 ± 0.2 5.0 ± 1.0 16 ± 9.8 0 (16/16)
5. Groups 1+4 ICc 44.7 ± 6.4 (49) 2.1 ± 0.1 5.1 ± 0.3 17 ± 3.0
Al 57.3 ± 3.8 (39)** 3.8 ± 0.3** 5.6 ± 0.6 15 ± 6.1

Values are means ± SE (n).

*

P < 0.05,

P < 0.01, t-test; the effects of p-cond are compared with pre-p-cond, i.e., control.

P < 0.05,

§

P < 0.01, t-test; the drug effects are compared with p-cond with saline.

**

P < 0.01, t-test; the effects of p-cond are compared between ICc and Al. ICc, central nucleus of the inferior colliculos; AI, primary auditory cortex; p-cond, pseudo-conditioning; MT, minimum threshold; BF, best frequency; CSu, unpaired conditioning tonal stimulus; Atr, atropine; Mus, Muscimol; SI, Somatosensory Cortex. The AI data were obtained by Ji and Suga (2008).