Skip to main content
. 2009 May 13;102(2):1026–1039. doi: 10.1152/jn.91051.2008

TABLE 1.

Number of significant correlograms by pair and feature type

CM–CM CM–PT CM–N PT–PT PT–N N–N Total
Number of pairs 12 22 40 15 75 51 215
Significant correlograms, % 6 (50) 8 (36) 12 (30) 9 (60) 28 (37) 21 (41) 84 (39)
Central peaks 2 5 7 6 12 12 44
Lagged central peaks 3 1 2 2 9 4 21
Lagged peaks 0 0 2 0 0 2 4
Lagged troughs 0 0 0 0 1 3 4
Central troughs 1 2 1 1 6 0 11

Entries are number of cell pairs; values in parentheses indicate the percentage of cell pairs that were correlated for each column.