Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 17;3:73. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-3-73

Table 3.

Functional comparison of SMAD responsive (from gene expression) and SMAD-target (from ChIP-chip) gene sets obtained using Ingenuity Core analyses

IPA Signaling Pathway Affymetrix (1095 genes) SMAD predicted (150 targets)

IPA ratio IPA p-value No. molecules IPA ratio IPA molecules
TGF-beta signaling 0.169 3.68E-06 14 0.012 SMAD3

RAR activation 0.08 2.50E-03 15 0.011 GTF2H2, SMAD3

IGF-1 signaling 0.108 3.58E-03 10 n/a n/a

Wnt/beta-catenin signaling 0.084 4.12E-03 14 0.018 CSNK1A1, DKK1, FRAT1

Cell cycle: G1/S checkpoint regulation 0.117 7.37E-03 7 0.033 HDAC9, SMAD3

BMP signaling 0.097 1.01E-02 10 n/a n/a

GM-CSF signaling 0.113 1.34E-02 7 0.016 CAMK2D

LPS/IL-1 mediated inhibition of RXR function 0.065 2.68E-02 13 n/a n/a

IL-4 signaling 0.1 5.15E-02 7 0.014 NFAT5

Only significant signaling pathways are listed. Ratio shows the relative overlap between number of molecules per pathway within each dataset over the total number of pathway-specific molecules present in Ingenuity Knowledge Base.