Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 19;4(8):e6682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006682

Table 4. WHO-defined 2003 endpoints for assessing antimalarial therapy: ACPR and ACPRp.

Treatment response, n/N (%) at: PP population ITT population
CDA (N = 796)* AL (N = 400)* CDA (N = 914) AL (N = 458)
Day 28
Early treatment failure** 8/760 (1) 6/381 (2) 65 (7) 37 (8)
Late clinical failure 41 (5) 16 (4) 40 (4) 17 (4)
Late parasitological failure 112 (14) 44 (11) 122 (13) 49 (11)
ACPR 604/765 (79) 315/381 (83) 687 (75) 355 (78)
ACPRp 708/765 (93) 360/381 (94) 791 (87) 403 (88)
Day 42
Late clinical failure 69 (9) 28 (7) 66 (7) 28 (6)
Late parasitological failure 167 (21) 75 (19) 179 (20) 82 (18)
ACPR 527/771 (68) 275/384 (72) 604 (66) 311 (68)
ACPRp 697/771 (90) 358/384 (93) 774 (85) 398 (87)
*

For the PP population, patients with missing data or indeterminate results were excluded − the denominator shows the number of evaluable patients. For the ITT population, patients with missing or indeterminate PCR results were treated as failures. For ACPRp, in the PP and ITT analysis, patients with new infections were considered successes at that time point. However, at subsequent time points, the PP analyses considered these patients as missing and the ITT analysis assumed that they were failures.

**

Early treatment failure is the same for Day 42.

ACPRp is ACPR corrected using PCR genotyping for reinfection. Reinfection rate = ACPRp − ACPR.