Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug;52(4):302–308.

Table 1.

Unadjusted comparison of demographics, morbidity and mortality among patients treated with prophylactic stabilization versus fracture fixation*

Characteristic Fracture fixation Prophylactic fixation p value
No. patients 350 201
Primary cancer type, % 0.10
 Lung 23.1 31.3
 Breast 17.1 13.4
 Kidney 5.1 7.5
 Prostate 7.4 4.5
 Other (multiple) 47.1 43.3
Age, mean (range) yr 66.8 (14.8–91.9) 64.8 (15.0–91.8) 0.06
Comorbidity, % > 1 22.0 15.9 0.08
Female sex, % 64.3 59.2 0.24
Length of stay in hospital, d 24.3 (1 – 155) 19.3 (1–105) 0.006
Surgical/medical complication, % 10.9 8.0 0.27
Infection, % 0.6 0.0 0.28
DVT within 3 mo, % 6.0 3.0 0.12
Urinary tract infection, % 4.6 4.5 0.96
Died, %
 During surgery 0.6 1.0 0.57
 Admission 20.0 9.0 0.001
 3 months 28.3 13.9 0.000

DVT = deep vein thrombosis.

*

We made statistical comparisons between the 2 groups using the Student t test for continuous variables or the χ2 test for categorical variables (with continuity correction). We used the Fisher exact test when 1 or more cells had fewer than 5 expected counts.

Seven patients who underwent both fracture fixation and prophylactic stabilization of the opposite femur are not included in this table (see Table 2).

Two cases.