Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 11.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2009 Apr 5;161(2):655–662. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.070

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Negative correlation between convexity tuning and the effects of adaptation on the response to the zero-convexity test stimulus. All single units with significant tuning to one of the 5 test stimuli were included in this analysis, with each dot corresponding to one unit. Values on the x-axis show responses to low convexity levels without previous adaptation (nA): Mean firing rate to T2 was subtracted from mean firing rate to T4. The y-axis shows differential effects of convex (A2) and concave (A1) adaptation on response to test rectangle (T3). Note the high correlation with negative slope between the two differential measures, indicative of a negative aftereffect.