Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Struct Biol. 2009 Apr 8;167(1):11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2009.03.019

Table 2.

Example Leginon tomography session results, parameters and performance For further characterization of Leginon’s ability to re-center targets and UCSF Tomo’s ability to track them during tilt series, please also see Zheng et al., 2004, Zheng et al., 2007, Potter et al., 1999, and Suloway et al., 2005.

Session
name		 Number of
tilt series		 Tilt range
(°)		 Tilt increment
(°)		 Pixel size
(nm)		 Defocus
(μm)		 Image size
(pixels)		 Binning
(pixels)		 Time
(hours)		 Mean re-centering
error (pixels)		 Mean tracking
error (pixels)
08sep10a 71 -60 to 60 1 0.96 -10 2048 × 2048 2 ∼32 74 ± 54 (n = 65) 13 ± 26 (n = 7074)
08oct30a 40 -60 to 60 1 0.64 -12 2048 × 2048 2 ∼22 164 ± 65 (n = 40) 13 ± 24 (n = 4880)
09jan04b 42 -60 to 60 1 0.96 -10 2048 × 2048 2 ∼22 84 ± 46 (n = 42) 12 ± 17 (n = 3538)