Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 17;10:223. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-223

Table 4.

Performance of models with FCD features on named entity classification and recognition

ID Feature(model) Classification (all terms) Classification (OOV terms) Named entity recognition
Precision Recall F-score Precision Recall F-score Precision Recall F-score
Run 1 Lexical (linear) 75.52 85.63 80.26 74.03 75.68 74.85 85.70 78.36 81.86
Run 2 FCD (linear) 81.59 87.77 84.57 (+4.31) 83.74 87.64 85.64 (+10.79) 87.98 80.70 84.18 (+2.32)
Run 3 FCD (SVD + RBF) 83.02 88.24 85.55 (+5.29) 83.12 85.31 84.2 (+9.35) 89.80 81.76 85.59 (+3.73)
Run 4 FCD (Combine (2, 3)) 82.46 90.35 86.23 (+5.97) 83.21 88.35 85.7 (+10.85) 89.29 82.45 85.74 (+3.88)
Run 5 All (linear) 82.96 89.31 86.02 (+5.76) 83.65 89.16 86.32 (+11.47) 89.93 81.71 85.62 (+3.76)
Run 6 All (Combine (3, 5)) 83.94 89.99 86.86 (+6.6) 83.92 88.86 86.32 (+11.47) 90.37 82.40 86.20 (+4.34)

In Run 1, 2 and 5 SVMs with linear kernel are used. In Run 3, SVD is used to reduce the feature dimension and a SVM with RBF kernel is used to classify examples. In Run 3 only features related to CDF I are used. In Run 4 outputs of Run 2 and 3 are combined. Run 6 is the combination of Run 3 and Run 5.