Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jul 15;74(4):1256–1265. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.023

Table 2.

Sliding movement of the tip of the diaphragm computed from the proposed and conventional deformable registration methods.

Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4
Distance
(mm)		 Error
(mm)		 Distance
(mm)		 Error
(mm)		 Distance
(mm)		 Error
(mm)
True value 13.9 - 17.7 - 20.4 -
Proposed method 8.5 5.4 13.4 4.3 17.7 2.8
Conventional method 5.7 8.2 5.7 12.0 7.8 12.6
Phase 5 Phase 6 Phase 7
Distance
(mm)		 Error
(mm)		 Distance
(mm)		 Error
(mm)		 Distance
(mm)		 Error
(mm)
True value 23.9 - 25.8 - 24.5 -
Proposed method 19.3 4.6 19.4 6.3 22.8 1.7
Conventional method 6.7 17.2 10.6 15.2 8.7 15.9
Phase 8 Phase 9 Phase 10
Distance
(mm)		 Error
(mm)		 Distance
(mm)		 Error
(mm)		 Distance
(mm)		 Error
(mm)
True value 25.8 - 1.65 - 10.9 -
Proposed method 24.5 1.3 15.0 1.5 8.8 2.0
Conventional method 12.1 1.37 7.0 9.5 6.0 4.8