Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 14;85(2):264–272. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.07.004

Table 3.

Nonword-Repetition Group Means for CMIP and ATP2C2 Risk Variants

Genotype (Number of Risk Alleles) Single SNP rs6564903 (CMIP)
TT (0) CT (1) CC (2)
Single SNP 96.62 92.57 86.30
rs11860694 (ATP2C2) GG (0) 96.54 99.14 99.85 89.65
CG (1) 91.77 99.40 93.10 85.84
CC (2) 87.03 88.44 88.33 83.32

The effects of CMIP (rs6564903) and ATP2C2 (rs11860694) on nonword-repetition performance were modeled as additive effects within a regression framework in the R package. This regression model included all available SLIC children with genotype and nonword-repetition data (n = 503). Group means were calculated for each SNP in isolation (“Single SNP” entries) and in combinations of genotypes (3 × 3 grid) across risk SNPs. Note that individuals carrying combinations of risk alleles performed significantly worse than those carrying risk variants at a single locus. Nonword-repetition scores are age adjusted and standardized against normal population controls with a mean of 100 and a SD of 15.