Table 4.
Conventional group (n = 9) | Rebamipide group (n = 6) | Statistical significance | |
Duration of fasting (d) | 7.9 ± 4.1 | 2.7 ± 1.8 | P = 0.0121 |
Duration of hospitalization (d) | 17.9 ± 6.8 | 9.2 ± 1.5 | P = 0.0092 |
Degree of ulcer healing1 (points) | 2.8 ± 0.5 (n = 5) | 3.5 ± 0.5 | P = 0.0797 |
WBC decrease2 (× 103/μL) | 8.6 ± 5.7 | 12.0 ± 5.6 | P = 0.3360 |
Values are the mean ± SD.
The ulcer lesion was scored according to the Sakita-Miwa classification of the stage of gastric ulcer, then the difference between the baseline score (at the time of diagnosis) and at the time of the follow-up colonoscopy was divided by the number of days between the baseline and the follow-up examination, to correct the results to the value on d 7 (A1: 6 points, A2: 5 points, H1: 4 points, H2: 3 points, S1: 2 points, S2: 1 point).
Difference in value between that measured at admission and that measured at the time of the follow-up was divided by the number of days between the two examinations to correct the results to the value on d 7.