Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 12.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2008 Mar 25;135(1):72–81. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.039

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of Participants Without Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms in Different Treatment Arms of Both Trials

Estrogen trial Estrogen plus progestin trial


Placebo
(n = 2808)
Estrogen
(n = 2741)
P value* Placebo
(n = 4788)
Estrogen plus
progestin (n = 5052)
P value*
Age at screening (y)
 50–59 824 ± 29.3 844 ± 30.8 1573 ± 32.9 1678 ± 33.2
 60–69 1289 ± 45.9 1216 ± 44.4 2145 ± 44.8 2279 ± 45.1
 70–79 695 ± 24.8 681 ± 24.8 .43 1070 ± 22.3 1095 ± 21.7 .72
Race or ethnicity, n (%)
 American Indian 15(0.5) 20(0.7) 17(0.4) 12 (0.2)
 Asian or Pacific Islander 45(1.6) 53(1.9) 122(2.5) 137(2.7)
 Black or African American 429(15.3) 389(14.2) 307 (6.4) 308 (6.1)
 Hispanic or Latino 113(4.0) 129(4.7) 171(3.6) 198 (3.9)
 White 2164(77.1) 2115(77.2) 4113 (85.9) 4324 (85.6)
 Other 42(1.5) 35(1.3) .44 58(1.2) 73(1.4) .60
Education, n (%)
 0–8 y 61(2.2) 69(2.5) 75(1.6) 77(1.5)
 Some high school (9–11 y) 139(5.0) 158(5.8) 162 (3.4) 184(3.7)
 High school diploma or GED 587(21.0) 578(21.3) 892 (18.8) 870(17.3)
 School after high school 1217(43.6) 1173(43.2) 1755 (36.9) 1975 (39.3)
 College degree or higher 789(28.2) 736(27.1) .51 1871 (39.3) 1925 (38.3) .10
Income, n (%)
 <$10,000 176(6.6) 172(6.7) 207 (4.6) 229 (4.8)
 $10,000–$19,999 501 (18.9) 490 (19.0) 582 (12.9) 643 (13.4)
 $20,000–$34,999 757(28.5) 748 (28.9) 1205 (26.6) 1333(27.7)
 $35,000–$49,999 546 (20.6) 493(19.1) 982 (21.7) 1044(21.7)
 $50,000–$74,999 413(15.5) 415(16.1) 865 (19.1) 873(18.2)
 ≥$75,000 263 (9.9) 267(10.3) .85 685(15.1) 682 (14.2) .51
Smoking, n (%)
 Never smoked 1434(51.6) 1429(52.6) 2392 (50.5) 2578(51.4)
 Past smoker 1051 (37.8) 1032 (38.0) 1852 (39.1) 1923 (38.4)
 Current smoker 294 (10.6) 257(9.5) .37 488 (10.3) 511 (10.2) .68
Physical activity, n(%)
 None 483 (19.0) 493(19.5) 693(15.4) 756 (16.6)
 Some 1164 (45.8) 1117(44.2) 1900 (42.2) 1903 (41.8)
 2 to <4 episodes/wk 360(14.2) 403 (16.0) 709(15.7) 752 (16.5)
 4 episodes/wk 533(21.0) 512(20.3) .28 1201 (26.7) 1146(25.1) .17
BMI (kg/m2), n (%)
 Underweight (<21) 118(4.2) 107 (3.9) 369 (7.8) 380 (7.6)
 Normal (21 to <25) 581 (20.9) 621(22.8) 1362 (28.6) 1424 (28.3)
 Overweight (25–30) 987 (35.5) 952 (34.9) 1648 (34.6) 1729 (34.4)
 Class 1 obesity (>30–35) 648(23.3) 581(21.3) 847 (17.8) 956 (19.0)
 Class 2 obesity (>35–40) 294 (10.6) 293(10.8) 354 (7.4) 381 (7.6)
 Class 3 obesity (>40) 155(5.6) 171(6.3) .28 179(3.8) 153 (3.0) .31
Waist circumference (cm), n (%)
 <70 119(4.3) 143(5.2) 402 (8.4) 399 (7.9)
 70 to <80 587(21.0) 588(21.5) 1319(27.6) 1431 (28.4)
 80 to <88 596(21.3) 602 (22.0) 1141 (23.9) 1176(23.4)
 88 to <98 738(26.4) 647(23.7) 971 (20.4) 1033 (20.5)
 98 to <114 601(21.5) 611(22.3) 757 (15.9) 810(16.1)
 ≥114 156(5.6) 143(5.2) .15 181 (3.8) 185(3.7) .88
Waist-to-hip ratio, n (%)
 <0.71 136 (4.9) 154(5.6) 328 (6.9) 300 (6.0)
 0.71 to <0.77 503 (18.0) 511(18.7) 1160 (24.4) 1201 (23.9)
 0.77 to <0.82 726(26.0) 755(27.6) 1281 (26.9) 1457 (29.0)
 0.82 to <0.87 673(24.1) 603(22.1) 1037 (21.8) 1095 (21.8)
 0.87 to <0.95 608(21.8) 577(21.1) 766 (16.1) 766(15.2)
 ≥0.95 149(5.3) 131 (4.8) .24 188 (3.9) 207 (4.1) .13
Prior menopausal hormones use, n (%)
 Never used 1400 (49.9) 1436(52.4) 3609 (75.4) 3737 (74.0)
 Past user 1018(36.3) 930 (33.9) 866 (18.1) 975(19.3)
 Current user 388 (13.8) 375(13.7) .14 311 (6.5) 337 (6.7) .26
Gallbladder disease or gallstones, n (%)
 No 2282 (81.9) 2233 (81.9) 4171(87.5) 4453 (88.5)
 Yes 504 (18.1) 493 (18.1) 1.00 594 (12.5) 577 (11.5) .13
Antacid use, n (%)
 No 2747 (97.8) 2681 (97.8) 4663 (97.4) 4903(97.1)
 Yes 61(2.2) 60(2.2) .97 125(2.6) 149(2.9) .31
H-2 antagonist use, n (%)
 No 2724(97.0) 2677(97.7) 4703(98.2) 4955 (98.1)
 Yes 84 (3.0) 64(2.3) .13 85(1.8) 97(1.9) .59
Proton pump inhibitor use, n (%)
 No 2781 (99.0) 2701 (98.5) 4750(99.2) 5018 (99.3)
 Yes 27(1.0) 40(1.5) .09 38 (0.8) 34(0.7) .48

BMI, body mass index; GED, General Educational Development.

*

P value of chi-square test for trend was based on ordinal categorical values.