Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 10;16(8):1176–1186. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00342-08

TABLE 7.

Differences and correlations between fresh and cryopreserved PBMC flow cytometric enumeration of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subpopulations

Phenotype No. of subjects per lab Median % in fresh (frozen) PBMC Median difference (%) (range) between fresh and frozen PBMCa Median (range) of correlation coefficientb No. (%) of labs with significant correlationsc
CD4+ CD45RA+ CD95 11-18 36 (34) −3.0 (−6.0-4.0) 0.90 (0.51-0.94) 6 (86)
CD4+ CD28+ CD95 11-12 37 (41) −3.0 (−8.0-−0.6) 0.87 (0.76-0.93) 7 (100)
CD4+ CD28+ CD95+ 11-12 57 (52) 5.7 (−1.4-6.5) 0.90 (0.81-0.94) 7 (100)
CD4+ CD38+ HLADR+ 4-12 7 (7) 0.0 (−2.0-1.0) 0.73 (0.52-0.76) 5 (83)
CD4+ CD45RA+ CD62L+ 2-8 35 (22) 11.0 (6.0-14.5) 0.47 (−1.0-0.70) 0
CD3+ CD4+ CD45RO+ 3-8 18 (15) 3.0 (−6.0-12.0) 0.32 (−1.0-1.0) 0
CD8+ CD28+ CD95 3-8 7 (10.0) −1.0 (−9.5-8.0) 0.65 (0.12-0.92) 2 (40)
CD8+ CD28+ CD95+ 3-8 25 (23) 1.1 (−2.0-12.0) 0.74 (−0.50-1.0) 2 (40)
CD8+ CD38+ HLADR+ 13-20 33 (25) 6.5 (3.0-12.0) 0.85 (0.76-0.93) 7 (100)
a

Differences of the indicated phenotype in fresh versus frozen PBMC were calculated by subtracting the percentage of the indicated phenotype in cryopreserved PBMC from the percentage of the phenotype in fresh PBMC. The data represent the median difference across all laboratories and the range of median differences at individual laboratories.

b

Spearman correlation analysis of fresh and frozen PBMC in each laboratory was used to generate a coefficient of correlation. The data indicate the median and the range of medians of the coefficient of correlations at individual laboratories.

c

Significance, defined by P ≤ 0.05, was calculated only for laboratories that tested PBMC from five or more donors.