Abstract

Addition of in situ generated di- or trisubstituted alkenylalanes to N-acyliminium ions provides rapid access to functionalized isoindolinones. Subsequent ring closing metathesis leads to tricyclic products. These transformations proceed under mild conditions and allow for the convergent synthesis of biologically significant scaffolds from readily available starting materials.
Keywords: Isoindolinone, aluminum, zirconium, hydrozirconation, carbometallation, N-acyliminium ion
1. Introduction
Isoindolinones constitute the core structures of numerous naturally occurring biologically active compounds such as magallanesine 1i and lennoxamine 2ii as well as many drug candidates such as pagoclone 3iii (Figure 1). Isoindolinones demonstrate a remarkably wide array of biological activities, including anti-inflammatory,iv antihypertensive,v antipsychotic,vi vasodilatoryvii and antileukemicviii effects, which renders the development of new synthetic routes toward these heterocycles particularly attractive. While several methods have been reported for the preparation of isoindolinones,ix some leading to the synthesis of natural productsx and compound libraries,xi many approaches suffer from a lack of generality or functional group compatibility.
Figure 1.
Biologically active isoindolinones.
In view of the potent and diverse biological spectrum of isoindolinones, we initiated studies directed at their preparation as part of our program for the synthesis of nitrogen containing heterocycles.xii We initially proposed combining our water-accelerated carboaluminationxiii or hydrozirconationxiv with an intramolecular N-acyliminium ion addition in a cascade process that would generate medium-ring containing isoindolinones (Scheme 1). N-acyliminium ions are versatile synthetic intermediatesxv and have previously been employed in the formation of simple isoindolinones;xvi however, with the exception of allylsilanes, the addition of functionalized organometallic reagents to these systems has not yet been exploited. Moreover, the intramolecular addition would potentially provide an entry toward strained medium rings containing (E)-alkenes.
Scheme 1.
Proposed intramolecular addition of alkenylalanes to N-acyliminium ions. A: Zirconium-Catalyzed, Water-Accelerated Carboalumination or Hydrozirconation/Transmetallation; B: Elimination; C: Addition/Ring Closure.
2. Results and Discussion
Our investigations began with the synthesis of methoxy-8 and phenoxy lactam 9 (Scheme 2). Alcohol 5 was obtained in 85% yield by the isomerization of the commercially available hept-3-yne-1-ol with KAPA reagent in 85% yield.xvii Imide 6 could then be constructed by a Mitsunobu alkylation with alkynol 5, which proceeded in 82% yield. Reduction with sodium borohydride was followed by a methanol exchange to give methoxylactam 8 in 40% overall yield (Scheme 2). With the key substrate in hand, we submitted 8 to our water accelerated carboalumination conditions (AlMe3 (3 eq), H2O (1 eq), zirconocene dichloride (10 mol%)) which only returned starting material with no evidence for elimination of methanol or carboalumination of the alkyne moiety (Scheme 3).
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of lactam precursors.
Scheme 3.
Attempted cascade cyclization of 8 and 9.
We anticipated the need for a better leaving group and hence prepared phenoxy lactam 9, which was generated by treatment of 7 with SOCl2 and catalytic DMF. The resulting unstable chloride intermediate was immediately treated with phenol in the presence of triethylamine to yield 9 in 34% yield.xviii When 9 was subjected to the carboalumination conditions, only alkylated lactam 10 (10%), starting material (52%), and decomposition products were observed by NMR analysis (Scheme 3).
These experiments suggested that the functionality present in these lactam acetals was inhibiting the carboalumination step. We postulated that the lactam group was responsible for the observed inhibition, as highly Lewis basic functionality has been noted to decrease the reactivity of aluminoxanes.xix Therefore, we performed a series of GC experiments to test this hypothesis with 1-heptyne, which is known to undergo rapid water-accelerated carboalumination. A control experiment demonstrated that the carboalumination of heptyne with AlMe3 (3 eq), H2O (1 eq), and Cp2ZrCl2 (10 mol%) proceeded to completion in less than 5 min at low temperatures (−78 °C to −25 °C) to furnish a 97:3 mixture of regioisomers by GC analysis (Scheme 4). Conducting the identical experiment in the presence of 1 equivalent of methoxylactam 8 dramatically inhibited carboalumination, with only 4.4% of heptyne undergoing conversion after 1 h at ambient temperature. Most likely, this inhibition is due to the coordination of Lewis basic functional groups to AlMe3 oligomers, thus preventing alkyne carboalumination.
Scheme 4.
GC analysis of the water-accelerated carboalumination of heptyne in the presence and absence of 8.
Due to the lack of reactivity in the carboalumination approach, we turned to hydrozirconation, known to be quite tolerant of diverse functionality.14 When lactam 8 was treated with Cp2ZrHCl, only the corresponding alkene was recovered (Scheme 5). Treatment of the intermediate alkenylzirconocene with AgClO4 or trimethylaluminum also provided no desired cyclization products. Our attempts to enhance leaving group ability by using pivaloate 11 also failed to promote cyclization under any of the above conditions. Highly concentrated reaction mixtures or prolonged heating resulted only in slow methyl group addition. Possibly, the ring strain present in the desired products is too high to allow the reaction to proceed under these experimental conditions.
Scheme 5.
Attempted hydrozirconation and medium ring formation.
Because the intramolecular cyclizations proved elusive, we turned our attention toward an alternative construction of these systems starting with an intermolecular addition process. Alkenylation of N-acyliminium ions can often require harsh reaction conditionsxx or unusual anomeric leaving groups;xxi a noteworthy exception is the mild intermolecular addition of alkenyl boronates reported by Batey et al.xxii We first explored the hydrozirconation of terminal alkynes as a method to generate alkenyl nucleophiles (Table 1). Hydrozirconation of 1-hexyne, followed by treatment with silver perchloratexxiii and lactam 13 yielded only a trace of addition product after 24 h at rt (entry 1, Table 1). Transmetallation to dimethylzinc also proved unsuccessful (entry 2, Table 1). Gratifyingly, hydrozirconation-transmetallation to trimethylaluminumxxiv generated an alkenylalane that reacted with lactam 13 in a moderate 43% yield (entry 3, Table 1). We further increased the leaving group ability by using acetate 14; however, product 17 was only formed in 30% yield while the remaining starting material was consumed (entry 4, Table 1). Attempts to perform this reaction in THF or toluene led to recovered starting material. In an effort to prevent decomposition pathways while retaining good leaving group ability, pivaloate 15 was synthesized and treated with the in situ generated alane to provide hexenyl isoindolinone 17 in 81% yield without any observed isomerization of the alkene moiety (entry 5, Table 1). Attempts to achieve this transformation under cationic conditions with silver perchlorate20 led to complex mixtures, seemingly arising from alkene isomerization. The mild conditions under which the addition proceeds and the ability to utilize readily available alkynes and pivaloate iminium ion precursors encouraged us to explore this process further.
Table 1.
Reaction optimization for the addition of hexenylzirconocene to lactams 13–15.
![]() | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Conditions | R (lactam acetal) | 17 [%] |
| 1 | AgClO4, 24 h, rt | OMe (13) | Tracea |
| 2 | Me2Zn, 12 h, rt | OMe (13) | - |
| 3 | Me3Al, 12 h, rt | OMe (13) | 43b |
| 4 | Me3Al, 4 h, rt | OAc (14) | 30 |
| 5 | Me3Al, 4 h, rt | OPiv (15) | 81 |
| 6 | AgClO4, 12 h, rt | OPiv (15) | Complex mixture |
Product was formed as a mixture of alkene isomers.
Starting material observed after 12 h.
Among the numerous methods known for the synthesis of substituted isoindolinones, only a few examples of Heck-type cyclizations install an alkenyl moiety at the 3-position.xxv The modularity of our approach warranted further investigation, and therefore we evaluated the substrate scope of this process. As shown in Table 2, silyl ether, carbamate, and sulfonamide functionalities are well tolerated, generating functionalized isoindolinones in a high yielding, one-pot procedure.
Table 2.
Variation of alkyne substrates.
![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Entry | R (alkyne) | Product [%] |
| 1 | C4H9 (16) | 17 [81] |
| 2 | c-C6H11 (18) | 19 [79] |
| 3 | CH2CH2OTBDPS (20) | 21 [71] |
| 4 | CH2CH2N(CO2Me)Ts (22) | 23 [62] |
To further probe the scope of this reaction, we synthesized succinimide-derived pivaloate 25 from 1-benzyl-3,3-dimethylpyrrolidine-2,5-dione (24) and subjected it to our optimized conditions (Scheme 6). Addition product 26 was isolated in 83% yield. This success bodes well for the extension of the cyclic iminium ion alkenylation methodology toward a broad class of heterocyclic electrophiles.
Scheme 6.

Addition to succinimide-derived iminium ion precursor.
We also explored the use of trisubstituted alkenes in this transformation. Although the lactam functionality had prevented an intramolecular addition, pre-forming the alkenylalane under our water-accelerated conditions, followed by addition of 15, provided isoindolinones 27 and 29 in 77% yield after only 15 minutes (Table 3). The flexibility and mild nature of these transformations are well suited for their application in the synthesis of biologically interesting target molecules and libraries.
Table 3.
Water-accelerated carboalumination – addition to lactam 15.
![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Entry | R | Product [%] |
| 1 | C4H9 (16) | 27 [77] |
| 2 | Ph (28) | 29 [77]a |
Product contains ~5% of a carbometallation regioisomer.
Since this strategy provided a rapid access toward alkenyl-functionalized phthalimides, we sought to revisit our initial goal of generating medium rings. As a model system, we synthesized alkyne 30 and allyl-pivaloate 31 and subjected them to our hydrozirconation-transmetallation conditions to generate 32 in 55% yield accompanied by considerable amounts of methyl addition side product (Scheme 7). It should be noted that carbometallation of 30 failed and the rate of addition for the alkenylalane generated via the transmetallation reaction was retarded due to the presence of the ether functionality. With 32 in hand, we screened conditions to form the desired 12-membered macrocycle. Although ring closing metathesis methodology23 has been demonstrated to perform well for the synthesis of a variety of macrocycles,xxvi rapid formation of the undesired 5-membered ring 33 was observed (Scheme 7).xxvii Increasing dilution, change of metathesis catalyst, addition of Ti(OiPr)4,xxviii or varying solvents did not influence the reaction pathway.
Scheme 7.
Attempted medium ring formation via ring closing metathesis.
Due to the ease of formation of pyrrolizidine 33, we explored the synthesis of this compound via addition of hexyne to 31 and subsequent ring closing metathesis to provide tricycle 33 in 75% yield (Scheme 8). Extension of this approach to the synthesis of fused azepines was achieved from indolinone 37, prepared from 2-(pent-4-enyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (35) via pivaloate 36 and 1-hexyne in 72% yield. Ring closing metathesis of 37 proved to be problematic in CH2Cl2 with several ruthenium catalysts, yielding only starting material or decomposition products. Addition of Ti(OiPr)4 in toluene at room temperature resolved these issues and yielded 67% of 38. Possible deactivation of the metathesis intermediate by the neighboring amide carbonyl could explain the difficulty in this transformation.xxix While not fully optimized, these reactions provide proof of concept for the conversion of our phthalimide substrates to structurally diverse tricyclic products.
Scheme 8.
Application of ring closing metathesis to generate 5- and 7-membered fused ring systems.
3. Conclusions
We have demonstrated that in situ generated alkenylalanes represent versatile nucleophiles for additions to N-acyliminium ions. While direct intramolecular cyclization strategies currently suffer from inhibition of the carboalumination reaction by Lewis basic functional groups, preforming alkenylalanes via hydrozirconation-transmetallation or carboalumination and subsequent addition to the lactam acetal substrates yield functionalized isoindolinones. This method applies easily prepared or commercially available starting materials that provide opportunities for diversification at numerous points and yields synthetically useful heterocyclic products in a one-pot transformation. Further elaboration of the alkenyl heterocycles through the use of ring closing metathesis leads to tricyclic products that are common motifs in natural products and drug-like molecules.
4. Experimental Section
4.1 General Details
All reactions were performed under an N2 atmosphere and all glassware was dried in an oven at 140 °C for 2 h prior to use. THF and Et2O was distilled over sodium/benzophenone ketyl, Et3N was distilled from CaH2, and CH2Cl2 and toluene were purified using an alumina filtration system. Cp2ZrHCl,xxx 18,xxxi 20,xxxii and 2224 were prepared according to literature procedures and all other compounds were purchased and used as received.
Reactions were monitored by TLC analysis (EM Science pre-coated silica gel 60 F254 plates, 250 mm layer thickness) and visualization was accomplished with a 254 nm UV light and by staining with a PMA solution (5 g of phosphomolybdic acid in 100 mL of 95% EtOH), p-anisaldehyde solution (2.5 mL of p-anisaldehyde, 2 mL of AcOH, and 3.5 mL of conc. H2SO4 in 100 mL of 95% EtOH), Vaughn’s reagent (4.8 g of (NH4)6Mo7O24•4 H2O and 0.2 g of Ce(SO4)2 in 100 mL of a 3.5 N H2SO4 solution) or a KMnO4 solution (1.5 g of KMnO4 and 1.5 g of K2CO3 in 100 mL of a 0.1% NaOH solution). Flash chromatography on SiO2 was used to purify the crude reaction mixtures.
Melting points were determined using a Laboratory Devices Mel-Temp II. Infrared spectra were determined on a Nicolet Avatar 360 FT-IR spectrometer. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker Avance 300 instrument in CDCl3 unless otherwise noted. Chemical shifts were reported in parts per million with the residual solvent peak used as an internal standard. 1H NMR spectra were run at 300 MHz and are tabulated as follows: chemical shift, multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, p = pentet, m = multiplet), number of protons, and coupling constant(s). 13C NMR spectra were run at 76 MHz using a proton-decoupled pulse sequence with a d1 of 3 sec, and are tabulated by observed peak. Mass spectra were obtained on a Micromass Autospec double focusing instrument.
2-(Hept-6-ynyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (6)
A solution of hept-6-yn-1-ol (5) (228 mg, 2.04 mmol), phthalimide 4 (302 mg, 2.04 mmol), and PPh3 (540 mg, 2.04 mmol) in THF (20 mL) was cooled to 0 °C and treated with DIAD (403 μL, 2.04 mmol) over 5 min. The reaction mixture was warmed to rt and stirred for 6 h. The solvent was evaporated, the residue was dissolved in EtOAc/hexanes (1:1, 10 mL) and the solids were filtered off. The filtrate was concentrated and chromatographed on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 1:5) to yield imide 6 (407 mg, 1.69 mmol, 82%) as a colorless oil: IR (neat) 3466, 3283, 2941, 2862, 2115, 1772, 1709, 1615, 1397, 1046, 720 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.84-7.79 (m, 2 H), 7.72-7.67 (m, 2 H), 3.67 (t, 2 H, J = 7.1 Hz), 2.17 (td, 2 H, J = 6.8, 2.6 Hz), 1.91 (t, 1 H, J = 2.6 Hz), 1.75-1.61 (m, 2 H), 1.58-1.51 (m, 2 H), 1.49-1.38 (m, 2 H); 13C NMR δ 168.3 (2 C), 133.8 (2 C), 132.1 (2 C), 123.1 (2 C), 84.2, 68.4, 37.7, 28.0, 27.9, 25.8, 18.2; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 241 ([M]+, 11), 186 (6), 173 (10), 160 (100), 148 (31), 130 (29), 104 (27); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C15H15NO2 241.1103, found 241.1107.
2-(Hept-6-ynyl)-3-methoxyisoindolin-1-one (8)
To a 0 °C solution of imide 6 (40.0 mg, 0.166 mmol) in MeOH (4 mL) was added NaBH4 (5.00 mg, 0.125 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 2.5 h, quenched with H2O (1 mL) and the MeOH was removed in vacuo. The residue was extracted with CH2Cl2 (5 × 3 mL) and the combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated to provide crude hydroxylactam 7 which was immediately dissolved in MeOH (4 mL), treated with d,l-camphorsulfonic acid (3.85 mg, 0.0166 mmol) and stirred for 16 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was partitioned between H2O (5 mL) and CH2Cl2 (5 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 5 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried (Na2SO4), concentrated and chromatographed on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 1:4) to yield methoxy lactam 8 (17.0 mg, 0.0661 mmol, 40% over two steps) as a colorless oil: IR (neat) 3298, 2925, 2854, 2115, 1702, 1466, 1412, 1059, 746 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.84-7.80 (m, 1 H), 7.61-7.49 (m, 3 H), 5.88 (s, 1 H), 3.79 (ddd, 1 H, J = 13.7, 8.1, 7.3 Hz), 3.24 (ddd, 1 H, J = 14.0, 8.0, 6.3 Hz), 2.87 (s, 3 H), 2.19 (td, 2 H, J = 6.7, 2.6 Hz), 1.92 (t, 1 H, J = 2.6 Hz), 1.75-1.63 (m, 2 H), 1.62-1.43 (m, 4 H); 13C NMR δ 167.6, 140.3, 133.2, 131.9, 129.9, 123.4 (2 C), 86.2, 84.3, 68.4, 49.1, 39.3, 28.0, 27.6, 26.0, 18.3; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 257 ([M]+, 18), 242 (17), 226 (20), 176 (66), 146 (100), 132 (39), 117 (21); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C16H19NO2 257.1416, found 257.1419.
2-(Hept-6-ynyl)-3-phenoxyisoindolin-1-one (9)
A 0 °C solution of imide 6 (307 mg, 1.27 mmol) in MeOH (20 mL) was treated with NaBH4 (36.3 mg, 0.953 mmol), warmed to rt and stirred for 1 h. The reaction mixture was quenched with H2O (10 mL) and the MeOH was removed in vacuo. The residue was extracted with CH2Cl2 (6 × 10 mL) and the combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated to yield crude hydroxylactam 7 as a colorless oil. A portion of the crude hydroxylactam (101 mg, 0.416 mmol) was immediately dissolved in THF (5 mL) at rt and treated with SOCl2 (30.3 μL, 0.416 mmol) and DMF (1 drop) and stirred for 14 h. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was dried in vacuo for 12 h. The unstable crude chloride was obtained as a colorless oil and immediately dissolved in THF (4.1 mL) at ambient temperature. This solution was treated with phenol (58.0 mg, 0.620 mmol) and Et3N (288 μL, 2.07 mmol) and stirred for 2 h. The reaction mixture was quenched with H2O (1 mL) and the THF was removed in vacuo. The residue was extracted with CH2Cl2 (4 × 5 mL) and the combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. The residue was chromatographed on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 1:3) to yield phenoxylactam 9 (45.0 mg, 1.41 mmol, 34% over two steps) as a colorless oil: IR (neat) 3296, 2936, 2115, 1707, 1588, 1491, 1415, 1222, 992, 780 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.85-7.79 (m, 1 H), 7.53-7.46 (m, 3 H), 7.33-7.27 (m, 2 H), 7.08-6.98 (m, 3 H), 6.42 (s, 1 H), 3.80 (dt, 1 H, J = 14.2, 7.4 Hz), 3.44 (ddd, 1 H, J = 14.0, 7.8, 6.4 Hz), 2.16 (td, 2 H, J = 6.7, 2.6 Hz), 1.91 (t, 1 H, J = 2.6 Hz), 1.78-1.61 (m, 2 H), 1.57-1.39 (m, 4 H); 13C NMR δ 167.4, 156.3, 141.3, 132.3, 132.0, 130.0, 129.7 (2 C), 123.5, 123.3, 123.1, 118.1 (2 C), 86.8, 84.2, 68.4, 40.0, 27.9, 27.6, 25.9, 18.2; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 319 ([M]+, 70), 265 (28), 226 (100), 198 (8), 146 (52), 132 (65); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C21H21NO2 319.1572, found 319.1573.
2-Benzyl-3-oxoisoindolin-1-yl pivaloate (15)
To a solution of benzyl phtalimide (8.89 g, 37.5 mmol) in MeOH (130 mL) was added sodium borohydride (1.42 g, 37.5 mmol) at 0 °C. The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 2 h and carefully quenched with H2O. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (2×) and the organic layer was separated, dried (MgSO4) and concentrated. The residue was dried to yield a white solid which was carried on to the next step without further purification. To a solution of the crude reduced phthalamide (1.00 g, 4.20 mmol) in THF (30 mL) was added Et3N (1.17 mL, 8.40 mmol) and pivaloyl chloride (621 μL, 5.04 mmol) at 0 °C and the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to rt and stirred at this temperature for 4 h. The mixture was quenched with sat. aq. NaHCO3, extracted with EtOAc (2×), dried (MgSO4) and concentrated. The residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 3:7) to yield 1.09 g (80% over 2 steps) of 15 as a colorless solid: mp 88.1 – 89.0 °C (CH2Cl2); IR (neat) 3419, 3062, 3031, 2973, 2934, 2872, 1717, 1408, 1276, 1122, 959, 751 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.92-7.84 (m, 1 H), 7.61-7.53 (m, 2 H), 7.50-7.43 (m, 1 H), 7.38-7.22 (m, 5 H), 6.89 (s, 1 H), 5.01 (d, 1 H, J = 15 Hz), 4.44 (d, 1 H, J = 15 Hz), 1.13 (s, 9 H); 13C NMR δ 178.4, 167.9, 141.3, 136.8, 132.5, 131.9, 130.2, 128.7, 128.1, 127.7, 123.7, 123.7, 81.0, 44.2, 39.0, 26.8; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 323 ([M]+, 35), 221 (100), 133 (65), 91 (100); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C21H23NO 323.1521, found 323.1515.
(E)-2-Benzyl-3-(hex-1-enyl)isoindolin-1-one (17). General Protocol A
To a solution of 1-hexyne (16) (60.5 μL, 0.526 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) was added zirconocene hydrochloride (156 mg, 0.605 mmol) and the resulting suspension was stirred at rt for 10 min. The resulting yellow solution was cooled to 0 °C and Me3Al (1.0 M in CH2Cl2, 0.605 mL, 0.605 mmol) and 15 (85.0 mg, 0.263 mmol) were added. The mixture was warmed to rt and stirred at this temperature for 1 h, quenched with sat. aq. NH4Cl, and extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic layers were separated, dried (MgSO4) and concentrated. The residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 3:7) to yield 65.1 mg (81%) of 17 as a colorless oil: IR (neat) 3479, 3031, 2927, 2857, 1694, 1615, 1400, 972 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.91-7.86 (m, 1 H), 7.56-7.42 (m, 2 H), 7.36-7.21 (m, 6 H), 5.90 (dt, 1 H, J = 15.0, 6.8 Hz), 5.30 (d, 1 H, J = 14.8 Hz), 5.09 (dd, 1 H, J = 15.2, 9.2 Hz), 4.70 (d, 1 H, J = 9.2 Hz), 4.17 (d, 1 H, J = 14.9 Hz), 2.13 (app q, 2 H, J = 6.7 Hz), 1.50-1.30 (m, 4 H), 0.94 (t, 3 H, J = 7.2 Hz); 13C NMR δ 167.9, 145.1, 138.3, 137.5, 131.8, 131.5, 128.6, 128.3, 127.3, 126.1, 123.6, 123.0, 62.7, 43.8, 31.8, 31.1, 22.1, 13.8; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 305 ([M]+, 100), 248 (40), 237 (70), 214 (40); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C21H23NO 305.1780, found 305.1785.
(E)-2-Benzyl-3-(2-cyclohexylvinyl)isoindolin-1-one (19)
According to general protocol A, alkyne 18 (66.9 mg, 0.618 mmol), CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL), zirconocene hydrochloride (183 mg, 0.711 mmol), Me3Al (1.0 M in CH2Cl2, 0.711 mL, 0.711 mmol) and 15 (100 mg, 0.309 mmol) afforded 80.8 mg (79%) of 19 as a colorless oil after purification on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 3:7): IR (neat) 3375, 3030, 2921, 2851, 2243, 1220, 1200, 1097, 844 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.92-7.86 (m, 1 H), 7.54-7.41 (m, 2 H), 7.35-7.20 (m, 6 H), 5.85 (dd, 1 H, J = 15.3, 6.6 Hz), 5.28 (d, 1 H, J = 14.8 Hz), 5.02 (ddd, 1 H, J = 15.3, 9.2, 1.2 Hz), 4.67 (d, 1 H, J = 9.2 Hz), 4.18 (d, 1H, J = 14.8 Hz), 2.14-1.96 (m, 1 H), 1.85-1.60 (m, 4 H), 1.42-1.00 (m, 6 H); 13C NMR δ 167.9, 145.1, 144.1, 137.4, 131.8, 131.4, 128.5, 128.3, 128.2, 127.3, 123.6, 122.9, 62.8, 43.8, 40.3, 32.6, 26.0, 25.8; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 331 ([M]+, 86), 248 (40), 237 (100); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C23H25NO 331.1936, found 331.1951.
(E)-2-Benzyl-3-(4-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyloxy)but-1-enyl)isoindolin-1-one (21)
According to general protocol A, alkyne 20 (94.4 mg, 0.306 mmol), CH2Cl2 (1 mL), zirconocene hydrochloride (78.9 mg, 0.306 mmol), Me3Al (1.0 M in CH2Cl2, 0.306 mL, 0.306 mmol) and 15 (50.0 mg, 0.153) afforded 57.6 mg (71%) of 21 as a colorless oil after purification on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 2:8): IR (neat) 3450, 2930, 2857, 1692, 1428, 1111, 735, 701 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.92-7.86 (m, 1 H), 7.72-7.65 (m, 4 H), 7.53-7.35 (m, 9 H), 7.32-7.21 (m, 5 H), 5.96 (dt, 1 H, J = 15.3, 6.8 Hz), 5.27 (d, 1 H, J = 14.9 Hz), 5.16 (dddd, 1 H, J = 15.3, 9.1, 1.2, 1.2 Hz), 4.71 (d, 1 H, J = 9.1 Hz), 4.16 (d, 1 H, J = 14.9 Hz), 3.77 (dt, 2 H, J = 6.3, 1.2 Hz), 2.37 (app q, 2 H, J = 6.6 Hz), 1.08 (s, 9 H); 13C NMR δ 168.0, 144.9, 137.5, 135.6, 134.8, 133.8, 131.9, 131.5, 129.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.2, 127.7, 127.4, 123.6, 123.1, 63.2, 62.6, 43.9, 35.6, 26.9, 19.2; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 532 ([M]+, 35), 488 (100), 474 (45), 306 (65), 252 (75); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C35H37NO2Si 532.2664, found 532.2664.
(E)-Methyl 4-(2-benzyl-3-oxoisoindolin-1-yl)but-3-enyl(tosyl)carbamate (23)
According to general protocol A, alkyne 22 (174 mg, 0.618 mmol), CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL), zirconocene hydrochloride (183 mg, 0.711 mmol), Me3Al (1.0 M in CH2Cl2, 0.711 mL, 0.711 mmol) and 15 (100 mg, 0.309) afforded 95.1 mg (62%) of 23 as a colorless oil after purification on SiO2 (acetone:CH2Cl2, 0.3:9.7): IR (neat) 3467, 3032, 2957, 2245, 1735, 1686, 1359, 1168, 733 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.92-7.78 (m, 3 H), 7.56-7.41 (m, 2 H), 7.39-7.18 (m, 9 H), 5.93 (dt, 1 H, J = 15.2, 7.0 Hz), 5.26 (d, 1 H, J = 14.9 Hz), 5.21 (dd, 1 H, J = 15.1, 9.1 Hz), 4.73 (d, 1 H, J = 9.0), 4.18 (d, 1 H, J = 14.9 Hz), 3.95 (t, 2 H, J = 7.0 Hz), 3.69 (s, 3 H), 2.58 (app q, 2 H, J = 7.0 Hz), 2.43 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR δ 168.0, 152.8, 144.8, 144.6, 137.4, 136.5, 133.0, 131.7, 131.6, 129.7, 129.4, 128.6, 128.3, 128.3, 127.4, 123.6, 123.2, 62.3, 53.8, 46.5, 43.8, 32.9, 21.6; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 504 ([M]+, 50), 262 (40), 155 (100); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C28H28N2O5S 504.1719, found 504.1724.
1-Benzyl-3,3-dimethylpyrrolidine-2,5-dione (24)
A mixture of 2,2-dimethylsuccinic anhydride (710 mg, 5.55 mmol) and benzyl amine (712 mg, 6.66 mmol, 1.2 eq) was heated over a bunsen burner for ~ 1 min. The cooled mixture was purified by chromatography on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 1:1) to furnish 1.14 g (95%) of 24 as a colorless oil: IR (neat) 2969, 2933, 1777, 1702, 1344, 1142, 709 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.29-7.21 (m, 5 H), 4.57 (s, 2 H), 2.47 (s, 2 H), 1.22 (s, 6 H); 13C NMR δ 182.5, 175.1, 135.8, 128.3, 128.1, 127.5, 43.2, 42.0, 39.7, 25.1; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 217 ([M]+, 100), 174 (33), 133 (22); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C13H15NO2 217.1103, found 217.1104.
1-Benzyl-4,4-dimethyl-5-oxopyrrolidin-2-yl pivaloate (25)
A solution of imide 24 (1.14 g, 5.25 mmol) in MeOH (53 mL) was treated with NaBH4 (200 mg, 2.62 mmol) at ambient temperature. After 6 h, the reaction mixture was concentrated, the residue dissolved in CH2Cl2 (50 mL) and treated with sat. aq. NH4Cl. The aqueous layer was separated and washed with CH2Cl2 (2×) and the combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4), filtered, concentrated and the resulting oil used without further purification. A solution of the crude oil in CH2Cl2 (50 mL) was treated sequentially with Et3N (2.19 mL, 15.7 mmol, 3 eq), DMAP (128 mg, 1.05 mmol, 20 mol %) and pivaloyl chloride (1.29 mL, 10.5 mmol, 2 eq) at ambient temperature. After 6 h, the reaction mixture was quenched with 3 M HCl and the aqueous layer washed with CH2Cl2 (3×). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O, dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 1:2) to yield 398 mg (25%) of 25 as a colorless oil: IR (neat) 2971, 1710, 1419, 1125, 707 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.33-7.21 (m, 5 H), 5.99 (d, 1 H, J = 6.3 Hz), 4.74 (d, 1 H, J = 14.7 Hz), 4.15 (d, 1 H, J = 14.7 Hz), 2.14 (dd, 1 H, J = 14.1, 6.3 Hz), 1.87 (d, 1 H, J = 14.4 Hz), 1.32 (s, 3 H), 1.22 (s, 3 H), 1.10 (s, 9 H); 13C NMR δ 180.6, 177.9, 136.6, 128.7, 128.2, 127.6, 82.1, 44.8, 41.5, 39.3, 38.7, 26.8, 26.5, 25.6; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 303 ([M]+, 36), 275 (15), 202 (85), 158 (46); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C18H25NO3 303.1834, found 303.1827.
(E)-1-Benzyl-5-(hex-1-enyl)-3,3-dimethylpyrrolidin-2-one (26)
According to general protocol A, hexyne (16) (9.77 mg, 0.119 mmol), CH2Cl2 (1 mL), zirconocene hydrochloride (30.7 mg, 0.119 mmol), Me3Al (1.0 M in CH2Cl2, 0.119 mL, 0.119 mmol) and 25 (18.0 mg, 0.0593 mmol) afforded 14.0 mg (83%) of 26 as a colorless oil after purification on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 2.5:7.5): IR (neat) 2958, 2928, 2868, 1692, 1411, 1262, 972, 752 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.35-7.23 (m, 3 H), 7.21-7.13 (m, 2 H), 5.53 (dt, 1 H, J = 15.0, 6.6 Hz), 5.16 (dd, 1 H, J = 15.3, 9.0 Hz), 4.94 (d, 1 H, J = 14.4 Hz), 3.88 (d, 1 H, J = 14.4 Hz), 3.73 (app q, 1 H, J = 7.8 Hz), 2.10-1.98 (m, 2 H), 1.99 (dd, 1 H, J = 12.9, 7.2 Hz), 1.58 (dd, 1 H, J = 12.9, 8.1 Hz), 1.42-1.28 (m, 4 H), 1.24 (s, 3 H), 1.11 (s, 3 H), 0.92 (t, 3 H, J = 6.9 Hz); 13C NMR δ 179.6, 137.2, 135.8, 129.8, 128.4, 128.3, 127.2, 56.9, 44.2, 42.0, 40.3, 31.8, 31.2, 25.5, 24.7, 22.2, 13.9; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 285 ([M]+, 20), 228 (20), 175 (30), 91 (100); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C19H27NO 285.2093, found 285.2090.
(E)-2-Benzyl-3-(2-methylhex-1-enyl)isoindolin-1-one (27)
General Protocol B
To a −30 °C solution of AlMe3 (89.0 mg, 1.24 mmol) and Cp2ZrCl2 (9.00 mg, 0.0309 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) was added H2O (11.1 mg, 0.619 mmol) dropwise. The reaction mixture was warmed to ambient temperature, cooled to 0 °C, treated with 1-hexyne (16) (71.0 μL, 0.619 mmol), stirred for 30 min and treated with 15 (100 mg, 0.309 mmol). The reaction mixture was warmed to rt and stirred at this temperature for 1 h, quenched with sat. aq. NH4Cl, and extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic layers were separated, dried (MgSO4) and concentrated. The residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 3:7) to yield 76.0 mg (77%) of 27 as a colorless oil: IR (neat) 2956, 2929, 2858, 1694, 1468, 1401, 749, 703 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.89-7.50 (m, 1 H), 7.53-7.40 (m, 2 H), 7.35-7.20 (m, 6 H), 5.31 (d, 1 H, J = 14.9 Hz), 5.06 (d, 1 H, J = 9.8), 4.81 (dq, 1 H, J = 9.8, 1.2 Hz), 4.09 (d, 1 H, J = 14.9 Hz), 2.07 (t, 2 H, J = 7.1 Hz), 1.67 (d, 3 H, J = 1.3 Hz), 1.50-1.22 (m, 4 H), 0.91 (t, 3 H, J = 7.2 Hz); 13C NMR δ 168.1, 145.7, 143.4, 137.5, 132.0, 131.4, 128.5, 128.2, 128.0, 127.3, 123.6, 122.8, 120.6, 57.9, 43.9, 39.3, 29.8, 22.2, 16.5, 13.8; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 319 ([M]+, 100), 221 (40); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C22H25NO 319.1936, found 319.1921.
(E)-2-Benzyl-3-(2-phenylprop-1-enyl)isoindolin-1-one (29)
According to general protocol B, alkyne 28 (68.0 μL, 0.619 mmol), AlMe3 (89.0 mg, 1.24 mmol), Cp2ZrCl2 (9.00 mg, 0.0309 mmol), CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL), H2O (11.1 mg, 0.619 mmol) and 15 (100 mg, 0.309 mmol) afforded 81.0 mg (77%) of 29 as a colorless oil and a 95:5 mixture of regioisomers after purification on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 1:3): Major isomer: IR (neat) 3030, 2918, 1693, 1602, 1432, 1400, 1250, 749 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.93 (dd, 1 H, J = 6.3, 2.1 Hz), 7.54-7.46 (m, 2 H), 7.35-7.26 (m, 11 H), 5.41 (dd, 1 H, J = 9.6, 0.9 Hz), 5.35 (d, 1 H, J = 15.0 Hz), 5.27 (d, 1 H, J = 9.9 Hz), 4.21 (d, 1 H, J = 15.0 Hz), 2.12 (d, 3 H, J = 0.9 Hz); 13C NMR δ 168.1, 145.0, 142.0, 141.3, 137.4, 132.0, 131.6, 128.6, 128.3, 127.8, 127.5, 125.8, 123.8, 123.7, 122.9, 58.2, 44.3, 16.3; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 339 ([M]+, 41), 248 (47), 234 (77), 91 (100); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C24H21NO 339.1623, found 339.1631. Minor isomer (characteristic peaks): 1H NMR δ 1.44 (d, 3 H, J = 6.9 Hz); 13C NMR δ 128.0, 121.9, 18.0;
(E)-(3-(Pent-4-ynyloxy)prop-1-enyl)benzene (30)
To a solution of 4-pentyn-1-ol (4.03 mL, 43.3 mmol) in hexanes (75 mL) was added 50% NaOH (75 mL), TBAI (801 mg, 2.17 mmol) and cinnamyl bromide (8.97 g, 45.5 mmol). The reaction mixture was rapidly stirred for 10 h. The organic layer was separated, dried (MgSO4) and concentrated. The residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 1:9) to yield 9.00 g (69%) of 30 as a colorless oil: IR (neat) 3298, 3027, 2951, 2854, 2117, 1478, 1365, 1111, 967 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.44-7.37 (m, 2 H), 7.37-7.27 (m, 2 H), 7.27-7.21 (m, 1 H), 6.62 (d, 1 H, J = 15.9 Hz), 6.30 (dt, 1 H, J = 15.9, 6.0), 4.15 (dd, 2 H, J = 6.0, 0.9 Hz), 3.60 (t, 2 H, J = 6.3 Hz), 2.34 (dt, 2 H, J = 7.2, 2.7 Hz), 1.96 (t, 1 H, J = 2.7 Hz), 1.85 (app p, 2 H, J = 6.6 Hz); 13C NMR δ 136.5, 131.8, 128.3, 127.4, 126.2, 126.0, 83.7, 71.2, 68.5, 68.3, 28.5, 15.1; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 199 ([M]+, 100), 186 (35), 173 (35), 131 (100); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C14H16O 199.1123, found 199.1126.
2-Allyl-3-oxoisoindolin-1-yl pivaloate (31)
To a solution of 2-allylisoindoline-1,3-dione (3.64 g, 19.4 mmol) in MeOH (100 mL) was added sodium borohydride (734 mg, 19.4 mmol) at 0 °C. The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 2 h and carefully quenched with H2O. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (2×) and the organic layer was separated, dried (MgSO4) and concentrated. The residue was dried to yield a white solid which was carried on to the next step without further purification. To a solution of the crude reduced phthalamide (3.60 g, 19.0 mmol) in THF (100 mL) was added Et3N (7.90 mL, 57.0 mmol) and pivaloyl chloride (2.81 mL, 22.8 mmol) at 0 °C and the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to rt and stirred at this temperature for 4 h. The mixture was quenched with sat. aq. NaHCO3, extracted with EtOAc (2×), dried (MgSO4) and concentrated. The residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 2.5:7.5) to yield 4.40 g (83% over 2 steps) of 31 as a colorless oil: IR (neat) 2976, 1716, 1405, 1135, 753; 1H NMR δ 7.88-7.80 (m, 1 H), 7.62-7.46 (m, 3 H), 6.99 (s, 1 H), 5.94-5.77 (m, 1 H), 5.29-5.15 (m, 2 H), 4.44 (dd, 1 H, J = 15.9, 5.1 Hz), 3.88 (dd, 1 H, J = 15.3, 6.6 Hz), 1.23 (s, 9 H) cm−1; 13C NMR δ 178.3, 167.5, 141.2, 132.4, 132.4, 131.8, 130.0, 123.6, 123.5, 118.0, 80.9, 42.8, 39.0, 26.9; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 273 ([M]+, 60), 172 (100; HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C16H19NO3 273.1365, found 273.1358.
2-Allyl-3-((E)-5-(cinnamyloxy)pent-1-enyl)isoindolin-1-one (32)
According to general protocol A, alkyne 30 (733 mg, 3.66 mmol), CH2Cl2 (10 mL), zirconocene hydrochloride (944 mg, 3.66 mmol), Me3Al (1.0 M in CH2Cl2, 3.66 mL, 3.66 mmol) and 31 (500 mg, 1.83 mmol) (reaction time increased to 12 h) afforded 376 mg (55%) of 32 as a colorless oil after purification on SiO2 (Acetone:CH2Cl2, 0.7:9.3): IR (neat) 2924, 2853, 1694, 1468, 1289, 1098, 968, 746 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.85 (d, 1 H, J = 6.6 Hz), 7.57-7.20 (m, 8 H), 6.61 (d, 1 H, J = 15.9 Hz), 6.29 (dt, 1 H, J = 15.9, 6.0 Hz), 6.02 (dt, 1 H, J = 13.8, 6.9 Hz), 5.90-5.73 (m, 1 H), 5.25-5.07 (m, 3 H), 4.87 (d, 1 H, J = 9.0 Hz), 4.60 (ddd, 1 H, J = 15.6, 4.5, 2.7 Hz), 4.15 (dd, 2 H, J = 6.0, 1.2 Hz), 3.70 (dd, 1 H, J = 15.3, 7.2 Hz), 3.53 (t, 2 H, J = 6.3 Hz), 2.25 (app q, 2 H, J = 6.9 Hz), 1.77 (app p, 2 H, J = 7.8 Hz); 13C NMR δ 167.7, 144.9, 137.2, 136.6, 133.2, 132.3, 131.8, 131.4, 128.5, 128.3, 127.6, 126.7, 126.4, 126.1, 123.5, 122.9, 117.5, 71.5, 69.4, 62.9, 42.5, 29.2, 28.9; MS (ESI) m/z (rel intensity) 396 ([M+Na]+, 100), 307 (20), 297 (20); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C25H27NO2Na 396.1939, found 396.1928.
3H-Pyrrolo[2,1-a]isoindol-5(9bH)-one (33)
To a solution of 32 (41.7 mg, 0.112 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (6 mL) was added Grubbs 2nd generation catalyst (4.75 mg, 5.60 μmol) and the red solution was heated at 50 °C for 1 h, cooled to rt and concentrated. The residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2 (Acetone:CH2Cl2, 0.4:9.6) to yield 11.7 mg (61%) of 33 as a colorless oil: IR (neat) 2872, 1614, 1468, 1395, 1366, 1080, 746 cm−1; 1H NMR (acetone-d6) δ 7.74-7.66 (m, 2 H), 7.66-7.58 (m, 1 H), 7.54-7.45 (m, 1 H), 6.28-6.20 (m, 1 H), 6.08-5.99 (m, 1 H), 5.53 (app d, 1 H, J = 1.8 Hz), 4.57-4.43 (m, 1 H), 3.98-3.83 (m, 1 H); 13C NMR (acetone-d6) δ 175.4, 148.4, 133.6, 133.1, 131.9, 129.4, 129.2, 124.6, 124.0, 71.1, 52.0; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 171 ([M]+, 60), 160 (70), 130 (55), 105 (60), 83 (100); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C11H9NO 171.0684, found 171.0676.
(E)-2-Allyl-3-(hex-1-enyl)isoindolin-1-one (34)
According to general protocol A, 1-hexyne (16) (420 μL, 3.66 mmol), CH2Cl2 (10 mL), zirconocene hydrochloride (944 mg, 3.66 mmol), Me3Al (1.0 M in CH2Cl2, 3.66 mL, 3.66 mmol) and 31 (500 mg, 1.83 mmol) afforded 341 mg (73%) of 34 as a colorless oil after purification on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 3:7): IR (neat) 2957, 2926, 1697, 1468, 1396, 971, 748 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.83 (d, 1 H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.57-7.38 (m, 2 H), 7.33 (d, 1 H, J = 7.5 Hz), 5.97 (dt, 1 H, J = 15.0, 6.9 Hz), 5.88-5.71 (m, 1 H), 5.22-4.97 (m, 3 H), 4.85 (d, 1 H, J = 9.3 Hz), 4.59 (dd, 1 H, J = 15.6, 4.5 Hz), 3.69 (dd, 1 H, J = 15.3, 7.2 Hz), 2.12 (app q, 2 H, J = 6.6 Hz), 1.48-1.28 (m, 4 H), 0.91 (t, 3 H, J = 6.9 Hz); 13C NMR δ 167.7, 145.0, 138.2, 133.1, 131.7, 131.4, 128.2, 126.0, 123.4, 122.9, 117.4, 62.9, 42.5, 31.8, 31.1, 27.0, 22.0, 13.8; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 255 ([M]+, 30), 198 (100), 172 (55); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C17H21NO 255.1623, found 255.1627.
2-(Pent-4-enyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (35)
A solution of 4-penten-1-ol (3.51 mL, 34.0 mmol), phthalimide 4 (5.00 mg, 34.0 mmol), and PPh3 (8.92 g, 34.0 mmol) in THF (220 mL) was cooled to 0 °C and treated with DIAD (6.69 mL, 34.0 mmol) over 5 min. The reaction mixture was warmed to rt and stirred for 6 h. The solvent was evaporated, the residue was dissolved in EtOAc/hexanes (1:1, 100 mL) and the solids were filtered off. The filtrate was concentrated and chromatographed on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 1:5) to yield 6.44 g (88%) of imide 35 as a colorless oil: IR (neat) 3466, 3077, 2939, 1773, 1641, 1397, 995, 720 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.88-7.81 (m, 2 H), 7.76-7.67 (m, 2 H), 5.90-5.73 (m, 1 H), 5.12-4.94 (m, 2 H), 3.70 (dt, 2 H, J = 7.5, 4.5 Hz), 2.20-2.07 (m, 2 H), 1.87-1.73 (m, 2 H); 13C NMR δ 168.1, 137.1, 133.7, 131.9, 122.9, 115.1, 37.3, 30.8, 27.4; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 215 ([M]+, 45), 173 (70), 160 (100), 148 (80), 130 (80), 104 (90); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C13H13NO2 215.0946, found 215.0946.
3-Oxo-2-(pent-4-enyl)isoindolin-1-yl pivalate (36)
To a solution of imide 35 (4.42 g, 20.5 mmol) in MeOH (100 mL) was added sodium borohydride (776 mg, 20.5 mmol) at 0 °C. The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 2 h and carefully quenched with H2O. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (2×) and the organic layer was separated, dried (MgSO4) and concentrated. The residue was dried to yield a white solid which was carried on to the next step without further purification. To a solution of the crude reduced phthalamide (4.23 g, 19.5 mmol) in THF (100 mL) was added Et3N (8.15 mL, 58.5 mmol), pivaloyl chloride (3.61 mL, 29.3 mmol) and DMAP (119 mg, 0.975 mmol) at 0 °C and the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to rt and stirred at this temperature for 8 h. The mixture was quenched with sat. aq. NaHCO3, extracted with EtOAc (2×), dried (MgSO4) and concentrated. The residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 1:5) to yield 4.70 g (76% over 2 steps) of 36 as a colorless oil: IR (neat) 3077, 2974, 2873, 1739, 1641, 1618, 1369, 1208, 1141, 959, 751 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.67 (d, 1 H, J = 6.0 Hz), 7.49-7.32 (m, 3 H), 6.89 (s, 1 H), 5.79-5.58 (m, 1 H), 4.91 (d, 1 H, J = 17.1 Hz), 4.84 (d, 1 H, J = 10.5 Hz), 3.73-3.55 (m, 1 H), 3.27-3.09 (m, 1 H), 2.07-1.93 (m, 2 H), 1.77-1.50 (m, 2 H), 1.11 (s, 9 H); 13C NMR δ 178.2, 167.4, 140.9, 137.1, 132.0, 131.8, 129.8, 123.2, 123.1, 114.9, 80.8, 39.5, 38.7, 30.7, 27.1, 26.6; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 301 ([M]+, 15), 246 (45), 216 (65), 200 (85), 146 (85), 133 (65); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C18H23NO3 301.1678, found 301.1681.
(E)-3-(Hex-1-enyl)-2-(pent-4-enyl)isoindolin-1-one (37)
According to general protocol A, hexyne (16) (420 μL, 3.66 mmol), CH2Cl2 (10 mL), zirconocene hydrochloride (944 mg, 3.66 mmol), Me3Al (1.0 M in CH2Cl2, 3.66 mL, 3.66 mmol) and 36 (552 mg, 1.83 mmol) afforded 368 mg (72%) of 37 as a colorless oil after purification on SiO2 (EtOAc:hexanes, 3:7): IR (neat) 3076, 2967, 2928, 2860, 1693, 1468, 1404, 972, 749 cm−1; 1H NMR δ 7.72 (d, 1 H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.44-7.28 (m, 2 H), 7.23 (d, 1 H, J = 7.2 Hz), 5.94 (dt, 1 H, J = 14.4, 6.6 Hz), 5.80-5.63 (m, 1 H), 5.03-4.82 (m, 3 H), 4.75 (d, 1 H, J = 9.0 Hz), 3.83-3.65 (m, 1 H), 3.23-3.07 (m, 1 H), 2.13-1.93 (m, 4 H), 1.75-1.51 (m, 2 H), 1.42-1.19 (m, 4 H), 0.83 (t, 3 H, J = 6.9 Hz); 13C NMR δ 167.6, 144.6, 137.5, 137.3, 131.7, 131.0, 127.9, 126.2, 122.9, 122.6, 114.7, 63.2, 39.4, 31.5, 30.8, 30.7, 27.3, 26.9, 21.8, 13.5; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 283 ([M]+, 20), 228 (70), 160 (100), 146 (50), 76 (50); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C19H25NO 283.1936, found 283.1934.
(Z)-7,8,9,11a-Tetrahydro-5H-azepino[2,1-a]isoindol-5-one (38)
To a solution of 37 (150 mg, 0.529 mmol) in toluene (100 mL) was added Ti(OiPr)4 (157 μL, 0.529 mmol) and Grubbs 2nd generation catalyst (22.5 mg, 0.0265 mmol) and the red solution was stirred at rt for 12 h and concentrated. The residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2 (Acetone:CH2Cl2, 0.4:9.6) to yield 70.7 mg (67%) of 38 as a colorless oil: IR (neat) 3024, 2926, 1680, 1469, 1419, 1298, 938, 709 cm−1; 1H NMR (CD2Cl2) δ 7.76 (dd, 1 H, J = 6.9, 1.2 Hz), 7.58-7.51 (m, 1 H), 7.46 (app t, 2 H, 7.2 Hz), 6.13-6.02 (m, 1 H), 6.02-5.91 (m, 1 H), 4.49 (dd, 1 H, J = 11.4, 2.1 Hz), 4.26 (ddd, 1 H, J = 13.5, 6.6, 3.0 Hz), 3.22 (ddd, 1 H, J = 12.6, 9.6, 2.7 Hz), 2.81 (app ddd, 1 H, J = 15.9, 7.8, 2.4 Hz), 2.53-2.26 (m, 2 H), 2.25-2.09 (m, 1 H); 13C NMR (CD2Cl2) δ 167.5, 145.9, 133.0, 132.7, 131.6, 128.8, 128.5, 123.5, 122.4, 60.6, 41.6, 35.2, 28.2; MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 199 ([M]+, 45), 145 (100), 117 (40), 90 (35); HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C13H13NO 199.0997, found 199.0991.
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by the National Institutes of Health - NIGMS CMLD Program (GM067082) and Merck Research Laboratories. JGP thanks the ACS Division of Organic Chemistry for a Graduate Fellowship sponsored by Wyeth.
Footnotes
Dedicated to Prof. Gerhard Erker in celebration of his 60th birthday and in recognition of his pioneering contributions to transition metal chemistry.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- i.Valencia E, Fajardo V, Freyer AJ, Shamma M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985;26:993. [Google Scholar]
- ii.Valencia E, Freyer AJ, Shamma M, Fajardo V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984;25:599. [Google Scholar]
- iii.Sorbera LA, Leeson PA, Silvestre J, Castaner J. Drugs Fut. 2001;26:651. [Google Scholar]
- iv.Li S, Wang X, Guo H, Chen L. Yiyano Gongye. 1985;16:543. [Google Scholar]; Chem Abstr. 1985;105:3788. [Google Scholar]
- v.Ferland JM, Demerson CA, Humber LG. Can J Chem. 1985;63:361. [Google Scholar]
- vi.(a) Linden M, Hadler D, Hofmann S. Hum Psychopharmacol. 1997;12:445. [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhuang ZP, Kung MP, Mu M, Kung HF. J Med Chem. 1998;41:157. doi: 10.1021/jm970296s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Norman MH, Minick DJ, Rigdon GC. J Med Chem. 1996;39:149. doi: 10.1021/jm9502201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- vii.Achinami K, Ashizawa N, Kobayasui F. Chem Abstr. 1991;115:255977j. Japanese Patent 03,133,955. [Google Scholar]
- viii.Taylor EC, Zhou P, Jennings LD, Mao Z, Hu B, Jun JG. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997;38:521. [Google Scholar]
- ix.For recent racemic syntheses, see: Yao T, Larock RC. J Org Chem. 2005;70:1432. doi: 10.1021/jo048007c.Shen L, Hsung RP. Org Lett. 2005;7:775. doi: 10.1021/ol047572z. and references cited therein.For recent asymmetric syntheses, see: Comins DL, Schilling S, Zhang Y. Org Lett. 2005;7:95. doi: 10.1021/ol047824w. and references cited therein.
- x.For recent examples, see: Comins DL, Schilling S, Zhang Y. Org Lett. 2005;7:95. doi: 10.1021/ol047824w.Heaney H, Shuhaibar KF. Synlett. 1995:47.Othman M, Decroix B. Synth Commun. 1996;26:2803.Othman M, Pigeon P, Decroix B. Tetrahedron. 1997;53:2495.
- xi.Boger DL, Lee JK, Goldberg J, Jin Q. J Org Chem. 2000;65:1467. doi: 10.1021/jo9916481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- xii.For recent examples, see: Wipf P, Graham TH. Org Biomol Chem. 2005;3:31–35. doi: 10.1039/b413604g.Wipf P, Fletcher JM, Scarone L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:5463. and references cited therein.
- xiii.(a) Wipf P, Lim S. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1993;32:1068. [Google Scholar]; (b) Wipf P, Nunes RL, Ribe S. Helv Chim Acta. 2002;85:3478. [Google Scholar]; (c) Negishi EI. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 2007;80:233. [Google Scholar]
- xiv.For reviews, see: Wipf P, Jahn H. Tetrahedron. 1996;52:12853.Wipf P, Nunes RL. Tetrahedron. 2004;60:1269.Wipf P, Kendall C. Top Organomet Chem. 2005;8:1.
- xv.(a) Hiemstra H, Speckamp WN. In: Comprehensive Organic Synthesis. Trost BM, Fleming I, editors. Vol. 2. Oxford; Pergamon: 1991. Chapter 4.5. [Google Scholar]; (b) Maryanoff BE, Zhang HC, Cohen JH, Turchi IJ, Maryanoff CA. Chem Rev. 2004;104:1431. doi: 10.1021/cr0306182. and references cited therein. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- xvi.(a) Nikitin KV, Andryukhova NP. Can J Chem. 2000;78:1285. [Google Scholar]; (b) Tranchant MJ, Moine C, Ben Othman R, Bousquet T, Othman M, Dalla V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:4477. [Google Scholar]; (c) Ben Othman R, Bousquet T, Fousse A, Othman M, Dalla V. Org Lett. 2005;7:2825. doi: 10.1021/ol050576z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Allin SM, Northfield CJ, Page MI, Slawin AMZ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999;40:141. [Google Scholar]; (e) Ukaji Y, Tsukamoto K, Nasada Y, Shimizu M, Fujisawa T. Chem Lett. 1993;2:221. [Google Scholar]
- xvii.Abrams SR. Can J Chem. 1984;62:1333. [Google Scholar]
- xviii.Kitching MS, Clegg W, Elsegood MRJ, Griffin RJ, Golding BT. Synlett. 1999;1:997. [Google Scholar]
- xix.Wipf P, Waller DL, Reeves JT. J Org Chem. 2005;70:8096. doi: 10.1021/jo051211v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- xx).Coulton S, Francois L, Southgate R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990;31:6923. [Google Scholar]
- xxi.(a) Washburn DG, Heidbrecht RW, Jr, Martin SF. Org Lett. 2003;5:3523. doi: 10.1021/ol0354066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Neipp CE, Martin SF. J Org Chem. 2003;68:8867. doi: 10.1021/jo0349936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- xxii.(a) Batey RA, MacKay DB, Santhakumar V. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:5075. [Google Scholar]; (b) Batey RA, MacKay DB. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000;41:9935. [Google Scholar]
- xxiii.For recent applications of cationic zirconocenes, see: Wipf P, Pierce JG, Zhuang N. Org Lett. 2005;7:483. doi: 10.1021/ol0475414. and references cited therein.
- xxiv.Wipf P, Pierce JG. Org Lett. 2006;8:3375. doi: 10.1021/ol0613057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- xxv.(a) Cho CS, Wu X, Jiang L-H, Shim S-C, Choi H-J, Kim Tae J. J Het Chem. 1998;35:265. [Google Scholar]; (b) Burns B, Grigg R, Santhakumar V, Sridharan V, Stevenson P, Worakun T. Tetrahedron. 1992;48:7297. [Google Scholar]
- xxvi.For a review, see: Fürstner A. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2000;39:3012.
- xxvii.For related examples, see: Ahn JB, Yun CS, Kim KH, Ha DC. J Org Chem. 2000;65:9249. doi: 10.1021/jo0012187.Kim IS, Zee OP, Jung YH. Org Lett. 2006;8:4101. doi: 10.1021/ol061614x.
- xxviii.Fürstner A, Langemann K. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:9130. [Google Scholar]
- xxix.(a) White JD, Hrnciar P, Yokoshi AFT. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:7359. [Google Scholar]; (b) Martin SF, Liao Y, Chen HJ, Patzel M, Ramser MN. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:6005. [Google Scholar]
- xxx.Buchwald SL, LaMaire SJ, Nielsen RB, Watson BT, King SM. Org Synth. 1993;71:77. [Google Scholar]
- xxxi.Wipf P, Janjic J, Stephenson CRJ. Org Biomol Chem. 2004;2:443. doi: 10.1039/b316741k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- xxxii.(a) Theus V, Schinz H. Helv Chem Acta. 1956;39:1290. [Google Scholar]; (b) Aitken RA, Atherton JI. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans 1. 1994:1281. [Google Scholar]











