Skip to main content
. 2009 May 5;587(Pt 13):3271–3285. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.169771

Table 3.

Carotid artery preconstricted diameter (μm) and percentage preconstriction (%) prior to dose response to ACh with and without l-NAME in the absence (CNT) or presence of pre-treatment with TEMPOL (TMP) or apocynin (APO) (n= 4–10 per group) in young (Y) and old (O) cage control (CC) and voluntary wheel running (VR) mice

YCC
OCC
YVR
OVR
ACh alone ACh +l-NAME ACh alone ACh +l-NAME ACh alone ACh +l-NAME ACh alone ACh +l-NAME
μm CNT 334 ± 4 292 ± 10# 362 ± 10* 318 ± 14# 338 ± 13 293 ± 6# 355 ± 11 323 ± 11
TMP 354 ± 7 334 ± 11 384 ± 6* 371 ± 7* 360 ± 6 320 ± 9# 369 ± 5 349 ± 9
APO 331 ± 7 330 ± 9 362 ± 11* 314 ± 14# 306 ± 15 300 ± 15 350 ± 6 325 ± 5#
% CNT 17.1 ± 1.2 28.4 ± 2.8# 16.3 ± 1.7 26.6 ± 2.7# 17.7 ± 3.3 28.1 ± 2.6 15.5 ± 2.6 23.2 ± 2.6
TMP 13.6 ± 1.7 18.9 ± 2.4 13.8 ± 1.2 15.8 ± 1.0 13.3 ± 1.9 23.0 ± 2.3# 13.2 ± 1.4 17.7 ± 2.3
APO 21.0 ± 2.2 21.7 ± 2.7 18.6 ± 2.9 29.2 ± 3.5# 21.1 ± 3.8 20.6 ± 3.7 14.3 ± 2.9 20.2 ± 2.9
*

P < 0.05 vs. YCC within treatments;

P < 0.05 vs. OCC within treatments;

#

P < 0.05 vs. ACh after l-NAME within the same group and treatment;

P < 0.05 vs. CNT treatment within dose response.