Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 14.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2008 Nov 15;73(3):690–704. doi: 10.1002/prot.22097

Table 2.

Calculated Interaction Energy of the Heme as a Function of Alpha, the Orientation of the Histidine Ligand

[Kcal/mol] AH/DH A/DH A/D
Total interaction energy
 Maximum −15.6 −20.6 −17.2
 Minimum −18.2 −24.0 −21.3
Electrostatic interaction energy
 Maximum −1.2 −6.2 −2.7
 Minimum −1.9 −7.8 −4.9
Parallel (alpha 0°) – pos. 1 −1.7 −7.6 −4.9
Parallel (alpha 90°) – pos. 2 −1.2 −6.4 −2.7
Perpendicular (alpha 0° & 90°) – pos. 3 −1.5 −7.0 −3.8

The total and the electrostatic interaction energies between the imidazole ligands and the heme. The plotted interactions in Figure 4 show only the ligand orientation energy difference for the sake of clarity. A is the propionate attached to the heme ring A and D to ring D. The propionatic acids are referred to as AH and DH, while the propionate is referred to as A and D.