Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 4;170(3):379–387. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp127

Table 2.

Comparison of RDD Controls, BC Controls, and US Births for Continuous Variables, Children's Oncology Group, 1995–2006a

Variable RDD Controls (n = 255)
BC Controls (n = 70)
RDD vs. BC P Value Combined Controls (n =  325)
US Population Estimate
Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Estimate 95% Confidence Interval
Maternal age, years
    Mean 30.02b 29.3, 30.7 29.12b 28.0, 30.3 0.22 29.83b 29.2, 30.4 27.18
    Medianc 29.58b 28.8, 30.6 29.00b 27.3, 30.0 29.50b 28.9, 30.3 27
Maternal weight gain, poundsd
    Mean 32.10 30.0, 34.2 31.94 27.9, 36.0 0.95 32.06 30.2, 33.9 30.98
    Medianc 30.00 28.0, 33.0 31.50 25.0, 35.0 30.00 28.0, 33.0 30
Birth weight, g
    Mean 3,446.63b 3,374.5, 3,518.8 3,395.06 3,248.2, 3,541.9 0.52 3,435.52b 3,371.0, 3,500.0 3,316.58
    Medianc 3,458.64b 3,402.0, 3,544.0 3,430.29 3,289.0, 3,515.0 3,458.64b 3,402.0, 3,515.0 3,350

Abbreviations: BC, birth certificate; RDD, random digit dialing.

a

For maternal age, the numbers of RDD controls, BC controls, and combined controls were 255, 69, and 324, respectively. For maternal weight gain and birth weight, the respective numbers were identical, that is, 255, 70, and 325.

b

The 95% confidence interval does not contain the US population estimate.

c

Based on a bootstrap confidence interval using the method of adjusted bootstrap percentile except where unstable, when the percentile method was used.

d

One pound = 0.45 kg.