Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;9:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-9-40

Table 2.

Accumulation of genomic material in nuclei of cap-gs105 mutants, cap-h, and cap-d2 morphants.

DNA content fraction
<2C 2C 2C – 4C 4C >4C
WT 2.2% ± 0.3% 87.9% ± 0.1% 4.5% ± 0.5% 3.5% ± 0.4% 1.3% ± 0.1%
cap-gs105 6.8% ± 1.7% 65.8% ± 4.0% 6.1% ± 0.5% 15.5% ± 1.3% 4.2% ± 0.7%
MOcap-h 4.3% ± 1.9% 70.1% ± 3.7% 8.2% ± 0.8% 13.1% ± 0.3% 2.6% ± 1.0%
MOcap-h+p53 3.7% ± 1.2% 74.2% ± 8.7% 6.6% ± 2.1% 11.2% ± 3.8% 3.0% ± 1.2%
MOcap-d2 9.8% ± 5.4% 61.4% ± 10.7% 11.3% ± 3.0% 10.0% ± 1.5% 4.7% ± 1.5%
MOcap-d2+p53 7.6% ± 3.5% 64.4% ± 14.2% 9.3% ± 3.2% 12.2% ± 4.2% 4.8% ± 2.9%

WT vs. cap-gs105

p < 0.05 p < 0.01 p < 0.01 p < 0.001 p < 0.01

WT vs. MOcap-h

p > 0.05 p < 0.01 p < 0.01 p < 0.001 p > 0.05

WT vs. MOcap-d2
t-test
p-values

p > 0.05 p < 0.05 p < 0.05 p < 0.005 p < 0.05

MOcap-h vs. MOcap-h+p53

p > 0.05 p > 0.05 p > 0.05 p > 0.05 p > 0.05

MOcap-d2 vs. MOcap-d2+p53

p > 0.05 p > 0.05 p > 0.05 p > 0.05 p > 0.05

Table showing the distribution of nuclear DNA contents among all counted cells. Values represent an average of four independent experiments. t-test p-values (lower table) reveal a significant shift from diploid to aneuploid and especially tetraploid nuclei in cap-gs105, cap-h morphants or cap-d2 morphants compared to wild-type. There are no significant differences in the genomic content distributions of cap-h morphant and cap-h/p53 double morphant or of cap-d2 morphant and cap-d2/p53 double morphant retinae.